Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 1225-1577(Print)
ISSN : 2384-0900(Online)
The Korean Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Vol.50 No.1 pp.1-7
DOI : https://doi.org/10.17779/KAOMP.2026.50.1.001

Vimentin Expression in the Epithelial Components of Benign Odontogenic Tumors

Kyu-Young Oh1,2*
1Department of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
2Department of Oral Pathology, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
* Correspondence: Kyu-Young Oh, Department of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea. Tel: +82-53-600-7561 Email: bigfish@snu.ac.kr
December 5, 2025 December 23, 2025 January 2, 2026

Abstract


Although vimentin is widely recognized as a mesenchymal marker, its expression in epithelial cells has been reported in several physiological and pathological conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the immunoreactivity of vimentin in the epithelial component of benign odontogenic tumors. Immunohistochemistry for vimentin was performed in a total of 28 benign odontogenic tumors consisting of 11 WNT pathway-altered odontogenic tumors (WNT-OTs), 12 ameloblastomas, and 5 adenomatoid odontogenic tumors. All WNT-OTs (11/11), including calcifying odontogenic cyst, dentinogenic ghost cell tumor, and adenoid ameloblastoma, were focally positive for vimentin. Specifically, clear cells in close proximity to dentinoid were consistently positive, a subset of ghost cells were positive with varying degrees of intensity, but morular structures were negative. Two thirds of ameloblastomas (8/12) were focally positive for vimentin, more frequently in peripheral cells or the basal layer than in central cells or the upper layers, respectively. All adenomatoid odontogenic tumors (5/5) were focally positive for vimentin, especially in peripheral anastomosing strands and some cells adjacent to calcifications. Vimentin expression in epithelial cells is a common feature of benign odontogenic tumors. The intratumoral localization of vimentin in WNT-OTs may provide insights into the nature of their histologic components.



양성 치성종양의 상피성분에서의 Vimentin 발현

오규영1,2*
1단국대학교 치과대학 구강병리학교실
2서울대학교치과병원 구강병리과

초록


    Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION

    Vimentin, an intermediate filament protein, is generally expressed in mesenchymal cells1). However, malignant epithelial cells can also express vimentin through a process known as epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which promotes the invasion and metastasis of carcinoma cells2). Intriguingly, vimentin expression has been observed in the epithelial component of benign odontogenic tumors, including ameloblastoma3-5), adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT)5-7), ameloblastic fibroma8), and ameloblastic fibro- odontoma9). It has been speculated that EMT, secretory function, or cellular differentiation similar to that seen in odontogenesis may be associated with the expression of the mesenchymal marker in benign neoplastic epithelial cells in odontogenic tumors3-6,9).

    WNT pathway-altered odontogenic tumors (WNT-OTs) are a recently proposed, genetically distinct group of odontogenic tumors characterized by mutations in WNT pathway genes, such as CTNNB1 (encoding β-catenin) and APC10-12). Calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC), dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT), and adenoid ameloblastoma (AA), which can be classified as benign WNT-OTs in a molecular context, also share histologic features, including ghost cells, dentinoid, clear cells, and whorled cellular condensations called morules10,11). The immunohistochemical features of benign WNT-OTs have been investigated in several recent studies, mostly focusing on nuclear accumulation of β -catenin as a hallmark of WNT pathway activation and expression of keratins as diagnostic markers10,11,13). However, their immunoreactivity for vimentin remains unclear14,15).

    This study aimed to analyze the immunohistochemical expression of vimentin in benign odontogenic tumors, including WNT-OTs, with a focus on its localization within the epithelial component of each tumor type.

    Ⅱ. MATERIALS and METHODS

    Tissue samples

    A total of 28 benign odontogenic tumors consisting of 11 WNT-OTs, 12 ameloblastomas, and 5 AOTs were included in this study. The 11 WNT-OTs consisted of 7 COCs, 2 DGCTs, and 2AAs. The 12 ameloblastomas consisted of 7 conventional ameloblastomas (CAs) and 5 unicystic ameloblastomas (UAs). The 5 AOTs were all follicular type. Non-decalcified, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were retrieved from the pathology files of Seoul National University Dental Hospital between 2004 and 2019. All diagnoses were confirmed based on the essential diagnostic criteria described in the latest WHO classification16). This study was granted exemption by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Dental Hospital (No. ERI22030).

    Immunohistochemistry

    Immunohistochemical staining was performed using a Leica BOND-MAX autostainer (Leica Biosystems) and an in vitro diagnostic antibody against vimentin (clone V9; ready-to-use; PA0640, Leica Biosystems). Endothelial cells were used as an internal positive control. For immunohistochemical evaluation, neoplastic epithelial cells showing cytoplasmic staining of any intensity were considered positive. Based on the percentage of positive neoplastic epithelial cells, slides were classified into negative (<1%), focally positive (1%-49%), and diffusely positive (≥ 50%).

    Ⅲ. RESULTS

    The immunohistochemical results of this study are summarized in Table 1.

    Vimentin immunoreactivity in WNT-OT

    All WNT-OTs studied (11/11; 100%) were focally positive for vimentin. Morules were generally negative for vimentin, whereas a few layers of cells surrounding the morular structures were positively stained (Fig. 1A and B). Clear cells adjacent to or within dentinoid were consistently positive for vimentin (Fig. 1C and D). Some ghost cells were positive for vimentin with varying degrees of intensity, while others were completely negative (Fig. 1E and F).

    Vimentin immunoreactivity in ameloblastoma

    Two thirds of ameloblastomas studied (8/12; 66.7%)–5/7 (71.4%) CAs and 3/5 (60.0%) UAs–were focally positive for vimentin. In CA, vimentin was more frequently expressed in peripheral cells than in central cells, regardless of histologic subtype (Fig. 2A and B). Similarly, in UA, the basal layer showed higher vimentin expression than the upper layers (Fig. 2C).

    Vimentin immunoreactivity in AOT

    All AOTs studied (5/5; 100%) were focally positive for vimentin. Rosette- or duct-like structures, the main histologic features of AOT, were negatively stained. However, anastomosing strands located at the periphery of nodules showed consistent immunoreactivity for vimentin (Fig. 3A and B). Some nodular cells around small foci of calcification were also positive for vimentin (Fig. 3C).

    Ⅳ. DISCUSSION

    In this study, vimentin immunoreactivity was identified in the epithelial component of several types of benign odontogenic tumors. In ameloblastoma, it has previously been shown that vimentin is expressed in peripheral columnar cells only or in both peripheral and central cells3,5). Similarly in this study, vimentin immunoreactivity was observed more frequently in peripheral cells in CA and in the basal layer in UA than in central cells in CA and in the upper layers in UA, respectively. This intratumoral heterogeneity may be attributable to cellular differentiation during tumorigenesis. Vimentin expression in ameloblastoma has been explained by EMT involvement3-5), which is supported by previous findings that E-cadherin transcriptional repressors, including Twist and Snail, are expressed in tumor cells in ameloblastoma 17). In AOT, vimentin was expressed in peripheral anastomosing strands and cells around foci of calcifications in this study, as has been reported previously5-7). These findings may be explained by tumor cells of varying differentiation (nodular cells vs. peripheral cells) or secretory activity of some tumor cells, such as cells around calcifications, in AOT6,7).

    This study presents novel findings on vimentin immunoreactivity in WNT-OTs. Although morules have been recognized as a distinctive histologic feature of AA, it has recently been demonstrated that other WNT-OTs, including COC and DGCT, also often have the same structures10,11,13,18). In addition to WNT-OTs, some tumor types, including endometrial and ovarian tumors and adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma, histologically show morular structures, which are immunoreactive for several markers, including β-catenin (nuclear), SATB2, CDX2, and CD1019-21). In this study, cells forming morules were negative for vimentin in contrast to adjacent cells with vimentin expression, further providing the immunohistochemical characterization of these unique histologic structures.

    Clear cells are observed in both solid (DGCT and AA) and, less frequently, cystic (COC) WNT-OTs, mainly in close proximity to dentin-like material called dentinoid10,11,18). It has been demonstrated that clear cells in WNT-OTs show nuclear translocation of β-catenin, indicating activation of the WNT pathway in these cells10,11). Considering that nuclear β-catenin is observed during tooth development and that canonical WNT pathway activation is associated with dentin formation22), nuclear accumulation of β-catenin in clear cells may be related to the formation of dentinoid located in their vicinity. In a similar context, the consistent expression of vimentin in clear cells demonstrated in this study might be attributed to their secretory function or inductive effect.

    Ghost cells have been recognized as a useful diagnostic clue for WNT-OTs16). Several hypotheses for the formation of ghost cells have been proposed, including aberrant keratinization, accumulation of enamel matrix proteins, and coagulative necrosis23). Interestingly, vimentin expression was identified in a subset of ghost cells in this study, which may contradict the aberrant keratinization hypothesis since vimentin is a type of intermediate filament protein distinct from cytokeratin1). Considering previous reports that cytokeratin is also expressed to varying degrees in ghost cells24), further studies are needed to clearly explain the mechanism underlying the co-expression of different types of intermediate filaments.

    In conclusion, vimentin expression in epithelial cells is a common feature of benign odontogenic tumors including WNT-OTs. The intratumoral localization of vimentin in WNT-OTs provides insights into the nature of their histologic components.

    Figure

    KAOMP-50-1-1_F1.jpg

    Vimentin expression in WNT pathway-altered odontogenic tumors. (A and B) Negative expression in morules (asterisks), highlighted by surrounding cells with immunoreactivity (original magnification X200). (C and D) Positive expression in clear cells adjacent to or within dentinoid (original magnification X100). (E and F) Ghost cells with varying degrees of staining intensity, ranging from negative to strongly positive (original magnification X200).

    KAOMP-50-1-1_F2.jpg

    Vimentin expression in ameloblastoma (original magnification X200). (A and B) Focally positive expression in conventional follicular (A) and plexiform (B) ameloblastoma with higher expression in peripheral cells than in central cells. (C) Focally positive expression in unicystic ameloblastoma with higher expression in the basal layer than in the upper layers.

    KAOMP-50-1-1_F3.jpg

    Vimentin expression in adenomatoid odontogenic tumor. (A and B) Positive expression in anastomosing strands located at the periphery of nodules (A, original magnification X100; B, original magnification X200). (C) Positive expression in some cells around small foci of calcification (asterisks) (original magnification X400).

    Table

    Summary of vimentin expression in benign odontogenic tumors

    –, negative; +, focally positive; ++, diffusely positive; AA, adenoid ameloblastoma; AM, ameloblastoma; AOT, adenomatoid odontogenic tumor; CA, conventional ameloblastoma; COC, calcifying odontogenic cyst; DGCT, dentinogenic ghost cell tumor; NA, not applicable due to the absence of the corresponding histologic component; UA, unicystic ameloblastoma; WNT-OT, WNT pathway-altered odontogenic tumor.

    Reference

    1. Kuburich NA, den Hollander P, Pietz JT, Mani SA. Vimentin and cytokeratin: Good alone, bad together. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;86:816-826.
    2. Paulin D, Lilienbaum A, Kardjian S, Agbulut O, Li Z. Vimentin: Regulation and pathogenesis. Biochimie. 2022;197:96-112.
    3. Florescu A, Margaritescu C, Simionescu CE, Stepan A. Immunohistochemical expression of MMP-9, TIMP-2, E-cadherin and vimentin in ameloblastomas and their implication in the local aggressive behavior of these tumors. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2012;53:975-984.
    4. Hao F, Liu J, Zhong M, Wang J, Liu J. Expression of E-cadherin, vimentin and beta-catenin in ameloblastoma and association with clinicopathological characteristics of ameloblastoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11:199-207.
    5. Xerez MC, da Silva Barros CC, de Souto Medeiros MR, et al. CLIC4 Function in the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Epithelial Odontogenic Lesions. Head Neck Pathol. 2024;18:40.
    6. Barnts K, Feng JQ, Qin C, Zhang H, Cheng YL. Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor: evidence for a mixed odontogenic tumor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022;133:675-683.
    7. Passador-Santos F, de Oliveira CRR, Teixeira LN, et al. Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor: Features of ameloblastic- like epithelial cells differentiation, secretion, and the nature of tumor cells products. J Oral Pathol Med. 2023;52:644-653.
    8. Kim SG, Jang HS. Ameloblastic fibroma: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:216-218.
    9. Miyauchi M, Takata T, Ogawa I, et al. Immunohistochemical observations on a possible ameloblastic fibro-odontoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 1996;25:93-96.
    10. Oh KY, Kim JH, Yoon HJ. Calcifying Odontogenic Cyst Demonstrates Recurrent WNT Pathway Mutations and So-Called Adenoid Ameloblastoma-Like Histology: Evidence Supporting Its Classification as a Neoplasm. Mod Pathol. 2024;37:100484.
    11. Oh KY, Hong SD, Yoon HJ. Adenoid Ameloblastoma Shares Clinical, Histologic, and Molecular Features With Dentinogenic Ghost Cell Tumor: The Histologic Spectrum of WNT Pathway-Altered Benign Odontogenic Tumors. Mod Pathol. 2023;36:100051.
    12. Oh KY. beta-catenin nuclear translocation and WNT pathway mutations in ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma: A literature review and proposal of a new molecular-based classification "WNT pathway-altered malignant odontogenic tumor". Oral Oncol. 2024;155:106907.
    13. Xue J, Zhang W, Zhang J, et al. Adenoid Ameloblastoma Shares Clinicopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Features With Dentinogenic Ghost Cell Tumor: A Comparative Analysis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2023;47:1274-1284.
    14. Crivelini MM, Felipini RC, Coclete GA, Soubhia AM. Immunoexpression of keratins in the calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor epithelium. J Oral Pathol Med. 2009;38:393-396.
    15. Polti LF, Sicco E, Martins-Silveira F, et al. Morphological Features of the Spectrum of Ghost Cell Odontogenic Lesions. Head Neck Pathol. 2024;18:102.
    16. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Head and neck tumours [Internet]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2023 [cited Dec 05, 2025]. (WHO classification of tumours series, 5th ed.; vol. 9). Available from: https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chapters/52.
    17. Oh KY, Yoon HJ, Lee JI, Ahn SH, Hong SD. Twist and Snail expression in tumor and stromal cells of epithelial odontogenic tumors. J Oral Pathol Med. 2017;46:127-133.
    18. Yang S, Chen X, Wang Y, Guo X, Shao Z. Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor revisited from a single institution in China with focus on adenoid ameloblastoma-like features. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023:101551.
    19. McCluggage WG, Van de Vijver K. SATB2 is Consistently Expressed in Squamous Morules Associated With Endometrioid Proliferative Lesions and in the Stroma of Atypical Polypoid Adenomyoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2019;38:397-403.
    20. Travaglino A, Raffone A, Russo D, et al. Does endometrial morular metaplasia represent odontogenic differentiation? Virchows Arch. 2021;479:607-616.
    21. Oh KY, Kim JH, Yoon HJ. Diagnostic Utility of SATB2, CDX2, CD10, and beta-Catenin Immunohistochemistry in WNT Pathway-Altered Odontogenic Tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2025;149:1027-1032.
    22. Tamura M, Nemoto E. Role of the Wnt signaling molecules in the tooth. Japanese Dental Science Review. 2016;52:75-83.
    23. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Chi AC. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. Fifth edition. Elsevier; 2024.
    24. Rumayor A, Carlos R, Kirsch HM, de Andrade BA, Romanach MJ, de Almeida OP. Ghost cells in pilomatrixoma, craniopharyngioma, and calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor: histological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study. J Oral Pathol Med. 2015;44:284-290.
    오늘하루 팝업창 안보기 닫기