Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 1225-1577(Print)
ISSN : 2384-0900(Online)
The Korean Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Vol.49 No.3 pp.55-71
DOI : https://doi.org/10.17779/KAOMP.2025.49.3.001

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Ca2+ Homeostasis in Oral Diseases

Weiyi Wang, Chanyong Eum, Okjoon Kim*
Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University

† These authors contributed equally to this work.


* Correspondence: Ok Joon Kim, D.D.S, Ph.D., Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Buk-Gu, Gwangju, 61186, Korea Tel: +82-62-530-4832 Email: js3894@jnu.ac.kr
June 10, 2025 June 17, 2025 June 20, 2025

Abstract


The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a major storage medium for intracellular calcium (Ca²⁺). Changes in ER Ca²⁺ homeostasis can lead to endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress), which, in turn, activates the unfolded protein response (UPR). However, the mechanisms involved remain unclear. This paper investigates the pathways involved in ER stress, ER Ca²⁺ homeostasis, Ca²⁺ channels, and related oral diseases. A systematic search of the literature up to April 8, 2025, was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar with specific terms for ER stress, Ca²⁺ homeostasis, and oral disease. The findings are summarized in both graphical and narrative forms. Disruption of ER Ca²⁺ homeostasis leading to ER stress and UPR can cause cellular dysfunction and inflammation in oral tissues. Understanding the relationship between ER Ca²⁺ homeostasis and ER stress in oral diseases could provide new targets for oral disease treatment.



구강질환에서 소포체 스트레스와 칼슘이온 항상성

왕웨이이, 움창영, 김옥준*
전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면병리학교실

초록


    Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION

    Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) is an important organelle in eukaryotic cells, involved in protein synthesis, folding, modification, lipid synthesis and calcium ion (Ca2+) homeostasis [1]. When ER homeostasis is disrupted (such as though Ca2+ homeostasis imbalance, viral infection or dysregulated redox homeostasis), an imbalance between the ER's protein- folding capacity and its functional requirements, resulting in the accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins. This condition can triggers an intracellular Stress response called Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress (ER Stress). Under ER Stress, cells activate the unfolded protein response (UPR) as an adaptive response[2, 3]. Normally folded proteins require specific conditions to remain stable in the ER lumen, and newly synthesized proteins first bind to Ca2+ dependent companion proteins such as glucose regulatory protein 78 (GRP78, also known as BiP). However, severe ER Stress promotes the expression of proapoptotic proteins such as CHOP (CIEBP homologous protein) and caspase-12, ultimately leading to apoptosis[4]. Disruption of endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis affects Ca2+ signaling, protein folding and modification, lipid synthesis, and other signaling pathways. Therefore, ER stress is closely associated with the occurrence and development of many diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic diseases, cancers, and oral diseases.

    Previous studies have had found that in response to ER Stress, cells have evolved the UPR, in which cells can detect unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER, transmit this information to the nucleus through a series of signal cascades, and take corresponding protective measures to restore the protein homeostatic state of the ER[5]. When ER stress occurs, the cell initiates the UPR program to slow down the protein translation process, thereby reducing the burden of ER protein synthesis. Additionally, UPR promotes the clearance of misfolded proteins by up-regulating the expression of chaperone proteins in the ER, thereby improving protein folding capacity helping cells resist stress and promoting cell survival[6, 7]. However, when ER stress cannot be reversed, cell function will be impaired, often resulting in cell death[8]. Currently, three UPR receptors are known to exist in higher mammalian cells, all of which are single transmembrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum: inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor 6(ATF6). There is growing evidence that ER stress-induced cell dysfunction and cell death are major triggers for a variety of diseases, making ER stress-related proteins potential therapeutic targets for these diseases. Moreover, cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels have been suggested to play a key role in the regulation of UPR, and calcineurin (Ca2+-dependent proteins) have been found to promote the survival of human and mouse astrocytes and African claw frog- oocytes during the acute phase of UPR[9]. Rapid elevation of calcineurin interact with the cytoplasmic structure of PERK to reduce protein translation, Which in turn affects Ca2+ levels. Additionally, changes in Ca2+ levels in the ER also induce ER stress.

    Ca2+ ions are important second messengers in cells. Ca2+ signaling is widely involved in many biological processes, such as proliferation, development, learning, and memory. At the cellular and molecular level, Ca2+ signal is involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and other physiological processes[10]. Therefore, the maintenance of Ca2+ homeostasis is essential for ER function. Proper storage of Ca2+ in the ER is essential for normal Ca2+ signaling and critical cellular functions such as protein synthesis, folding, and maturation. The disruption of Ca2+ homeostasis in ER may cause ER stress. Imbalance of Ca2+ homeostasis in ER is associated with many diseases, such as heart disease, neurological diseases and oral diseases[11]. At present, both Ca2+ depletion and Ca2+ overload in the ER are known to cause ER stress, which activates UPR. ER Ca2+ homeostasis involves of Ca2+ binding proteins (such as calreticulin, BIP, and GRP94), ER-resident Ca2+ transporters, and Ca2+ channel regulators, including inositol 1,4,5 -triphosphate receptor (IP3R), ryanodine receptors (RyRs), Transient receptor potential cation channels(TRP), Transmembrane and Coiled-Coil Domains 1(TMCO1), Sarcoplasmic/ Endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) and Store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE)of STIM1/Orai l pathway[12]. There is a complex bidirectional regulatory relationship between ER stress and Ca2+. The changes of Ca2+ can not only induce ER stress, but also play a key role in the process of cellular stress response [13]. The maintenance of ER Ca2+ homeostasis is essential for the physiological function of cells, and imbalances in Ca2+ may lead to the development of ER dysfunction and related diseases. Thus, studying the relationship between ER stress and Ca2+ is of great significance for understanding cellular stress mechanism response and developing new therapeutic strategies.

    Disturbed Ca2+ homeostasis in the ER is also associated with many oral diseases. For example, bacterial infection in periodontitis can lead to ER stress in periodontal ligament cells, resulting in apoptosis and ultimately periodontal tissue destruction[14]. ER stress has been implicated in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and is significantly associated with increased cell proliferation and angiogenesis. One study showed that exogenous ceramides induce ACC cancer cell death through disruption of ER Ca2+ homeostasis, triggering severe ER stress[15]. Similarly Osteoarthritis is a common chronic degenerative joint disease characterized by progressive cartilage erosion, has been linked to ER stress. Decreased Derlin-3 expression is related to the apoptosis of mandibular condyle chondrocytes mediated through biomechanically induced ER stress pathway, suggesting it as a therapeutic target [16]. Moreover, ER Ca2+ homeostasis imbalance is closely associated with oral squamous cell carcinoma development[16]. Therefore, in-depth study of ER Ca2+ homeostasis and its mechanism in oral diseases is of great significance to reveal the pathogenesis and discover novel therapeutic targets.

    In this review, we focus on the mechanism between ER Ca2+ homeostasis and ER stress, and discuss their relevance to oral disease.

    1. ER Stress and UPR

    Various pathological conditions, including hypoxia, gene mutation, inhibition of glycosylation, nutrient deficiency, oxidative stress and Ca2+ homeostasis imbalance can disrupt protein homeostasis, resulting in accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER lumen, commonly referred to as ER stress. To restore protein folding capacity and meet protein synthesis, cells activate the UPR, cellular stress response mechanism. UPR is a complex and highly regulated network designed to restore normal protein homeostasis by enhancing ER folding capacity and removing misfolded proteins.

    UPR activation can buffers ER stress by restoring protein folding homeostasis, and UPR enhances ER protein folding capacity by increasing the expression of molecular chaperons (e.g. GRP78 or BiP) and folding enzymes. This assist in repairing misfolded proteins, ensuring proper protein folding and efficient quality control within the ER[17]. UPR also promotes the degradation of unfolded proteins by activating the endoplasmic reticulum associated protein degradation (ERAD) pathway. ERAD identifies misfolded proteins and directs them to the proteasome for degradation, thus preventing intracellular accumulating[6, 18]. To further reduce ER stress, the UPR inhibits translation via the PERK pathway, reducing synthesis of new proteins and providing time for the cells to restore ER function. By regulating gene expression, the UPR enables cellular adaptation to ER stress[19]. For example, ATF6 and XBP1s enhances the expression of genes relevant to antioxidant and metabolic adaptation, facilitating cells survival under stress[20, 21]. Furthermore, The UPR detects ER protein folding level and adjusts the folding capacity according balancing protein homeostasis. Depending on the severity and duration of ER stress, the UPR can shift from an adaptive mechanism to a triggering apoptosis implicated in the development of various diseases.

    UPR consist of two type; adaptive UPR and terminal UPR. When cells face ER stress, IRE1α, PERK, and ATF6 pathway are activated to relieve ER stress and promote cell survival. However, if the adaptive UPR is fail due to severe or prolonged ER stress, terminal UPR is activated, leading to apoptosis [22].

    IRE1α is the most conserved UPR receptor. Under normal physiological conditions, BIP maintains IRE1αthe monomer inactivation state by binding its lumen domain[23]. During the ER stress, BIP from IRE1α, which subsequently dimerize or oligomerize, activating its Ribonuclease (RNase) domain [24]. Activated IRE1αexcises, producing spliced XBP1 (X-box binding protein 1) mRNA, translated into active XBP1s (XBP1 splicing) transcription factors[25, 26]. XBP1s promote expression of URP target gene, facilitating protein transport, folding, quality control, and ERAD to reduce ER stress[27]. Overactivation of IRE1αcan also degrade ER-localized mRNAs via regulated IRE1α-dependent decay (RIDD), reducing the burden of protein folding [28, 29]. PERK is also a type I single transmembrane protein on the ER, and is activated on ER Stress when BIP dissociates from it, leading to phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α)[30,31]. Phosphorylated eIF2α reduces the translation initiation rate and inhibits the translation process by preventing the formation of ribosome initiation complexes[32, 33]. In addition, under ER stress, activated PERK promotes NRF2 phosphorylation, resulting in NRF2 dissociation from KEAP1 and activation. ATF4 also induces DNA-damage-inducible 34(GADD34), which, through interaction with the catalytic subunit of type 1 protein serine/ threonine phosphatase (PP1), enables the dephosphorylation of eI2Fαand restoration of protein synthesis[34]. ATF6 is a type II transmembrane protein on the ER. NRF2 is then transferred to the nucleus to further activate the transcription of proteins with antioxidant activity and counteract the ROS level in ER stress cells, thus playing its role in anti- oxidative stress[35]. Under normal physiological conditions, the interaction between BIP and ATF6’s ER domain masks the inactivation of ATF6’s Golgi localization sequences (GLS). Under ER stress, Bip dissociates from ATF6, exposing the Golgi localization sequence GLS, which is then exported from ER to the Golgi complex via coat protein Ⅱ (CopII) vesicles. Subsequently in the Golgi apparatus, ATF6 is cleaved by proteases S1P and S2P, releasing its cytoplasmic domain (releasing the n-terminal transcriptional activation domain (TAD) fragment into the nucleus), which acts as a transcription factor (ATF6f). ATF6f induces the expression of genes involved in protein folding, secretion, and ER-re lated degradation[36, 37].

    Each of the three receptors of UPR has a set of pro-apoptotic signaling pathways. When ER stress is over-activated, phosphorylated IRE1α is transformed into polymers or oligomers. In the case of continuous oligomerization, the Ribonuclease (RNase) domain of IRE1-α cuts hundreds of ER localized mRNA containing N-terminal signal sequences for degradation through the IRE1-dependent decay (RIDD) pathway, resulting in the consumption of protein folding components, further exacerbating ER stress[26, 28]. Overactivation of IRE1α was found to raise thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP)by lowering the levels of microRNA miR-17 ( TXNIP was a linchpin of the terminal UPR). Elevated TXNIP activates the NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, leading to the cleavage of procaspase-1 and the secretion of interleukin- 1β (IL-1β), ultimately leading to cell death[39]. Additionally, oligomerization of IRE1αleads to activation of pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic proteins[38, 39]. The IRE1 α-TXNIP pathway is therefore thought to be involved in terminal UPR, promoting aseptic inflammation and programmed cell death, which may be targeted to develop effective therapies for cell degenerative diseases. Under severe ER stress, IRE1α can activate the downstream target JNK, and phosphorylation of JNK leads to apoptosis[40]. Several studies have found that ER stress-induced apoptosis is closely related to the pathogenesis of a range of cancers. Asiatic acid induces ER stress and activates the Grp78/IRE1α /JNK and calpain pathways, inhibiting tongue cancer growth[42]. Activation of apoptosis-signal regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) and JUN N-terminal kinase (JNK) in the downstream apoptosis signaling pathway, as well as nuclear factor kappa- B (NF-KB) activation in downstream inflammatory signaling pathway, are involved, promoting programmed cell apoptosis[41]. For PERK, under prolonged stress conditions, PERK mediated sustained phosphorylation of eIF2α and increased ATF4 expression lead to CHOP-induced apoptotic cell death through various signaling pathways. ATF4 and CHOP directly induce genes involved in protein synthesis and URP, leading to ATP depletion, Oxidative stress and apoptosis[43, 44]. For ATF6, ATF6 translocates to the Golgi, where it is cleaved. Additionally, studies have shown that PERK activation phosphorylates eIF2α during ER stress, which can induce the activation of nuclear factor-KappaB (NF-kB) signaling pathway[45]. The subsequent ATF6 fragment (pATF6(N)) translocates to the nucleus and initiates the expression of its target genes, such as chaperones, ERAD-associated genes, and the pro-apoptotic genes CHOP and pXBP1(S)[25]. Multiple pro-apoptotic signals from UPR sensors eventually converge on the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, and then mitochondrial proteins such as cytochrome C and Smac/Diablo are released into the cytoplasm, this pathway is triggered, leading to a cascade of downstream Caspase-related proteins, ultimately resulting in apoptosis. It has been found that siRNA-mediated silencing of ATF6 leads to a decrease in acute-phase CHOP induction but results in prolonged CHOP induction, suggesting that ATF6 is an important regulator of cell fate decisions under chronic ER stress[46]. The mitochondrial apoptosis pathway is mainly regulated by the BCL-2 protein family, including BCL-2-associated X protein (BAX) protein and BCL-2 homologous antagonist/killer (BAK) proteins. The BCL-2 family consists of pro-death and anti-death proteins that control the apoptotic pathway of ER stress by regulating the integrity of the mitochondrial outer membrane[47].

    In addition, UPR also affects the composition of mitochondria. ER stress can be transferred mitochondria by altering metabolite (Ca2+) translocation or through the UPR signaling pathway. ATF4, for example, has been shown to control the expression of the ubiquitin ligase Parkin, a key regulator of mitochondrial function and dynamics[48]. In turn, Parkin's ability to enhance UPR signal transduction by activating the sXBP1 pathway illustrates mutual activation[49]. Thus, UPR affects mitochondrial function at multiple levels: it induces mitochondrial autophagy to clear stress-damaged mitochondria, regulates mitochondrial bioenergetics by influencing Mitochondria-Associated Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane (MAM), and promotes the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential[51]. In addition, ATF6 is associated with the activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ -coactivator 1α (PCG1α), a major regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis, thus linking UPR to metabolic gene programs[50].

    Ⅱ. Ca2+ and ER stress

    The ER is the largest reservoir of calcium ions in the cell, and there are a large number of chaperone proteins with an affinity for Ca2+ ions in the ER lumen. Changes in Ca2+ concentration in the ER will affect protein folding in the ER, leading to ER stress[52]. At physiological rest, the concentration of Ca2+ in the ER ranges from 500μmol/L to 1mmol/L, and Ca2+ is generally released into the cytoplasm through the ER Ca2+ channel RyRs or IP3R. ER Stress caused by Ca2+ is closely related to the pathogenesis of many diseases, such as salivary gland dysfunction, enamel development, and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Under the stimulation of physiological activities, the precise regulation of Ca2+ concentration can generate accurate calcium signals to fine-regulate cell functions. Both extracellular Ca2+ flow and intracellular Ca2+ release can lead to increased cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration and calcium signaling[53, 54]. The generation of accurate calcium signals requires that the Ca2+ concentration in the ER and cytoplasm be maintained within a stable range, which is called Ca2+ homeostasis. Ca2+ release channels and transporters of Ca2+ on the ER include IP3R, RyRS, TMCO1, SERCA, TRP and SOCE of STIM1/Orai l pathway[55]. Therefore, the regulation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration is important for achieving normal cell function.

    IP3R, RyRs, TMCO1, and SERCA are located on the ER membrane. When Ca2+ in the ER is released into the cytoplasm, signaling first begins with signals generated at the plasma membrane. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and receptor tyrosine kinases (PTKs) activate phospholipase C(PLC), which then hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-diphosphate (PIP2) in the plasma membrane to produce inositol 1, 4, 5-triphosphate (IP3), which then diffuses to bind to IP3 receptors (IP3R) on the ER, causing them to open. If IP3 is abscent, IP3R remains inactive. This eventually results in the release of Ca2+ from the ER into the cytoplasm [56]. On stimulation, IP3 binds to the IP3R receptor and promotes the opening of IP3R channels to release Ca2+. Cytoplasmic Ca2+ also binds to the activation site of these channels to promote the release of Ca2+ from the ER. Upon Ca2+ depletion from the ER via IP3R, the Ca2+-sensitive the sigma-1 receptor (Sig-1R) dissociates from BiP and associates with IP3R, thereby protecting the otherwise unstable IP3R from Endoplasmic-reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD) and prolonging Ca2+ signaling to the mitochondria. This process is called Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR)[57]. When the concentration of cytoplasmic free Ca2+ is 100-200 nmol/L, RyRs remain a closed [58]. When the concentration of cytoplasmic Ca2+ exceeds above a certain threshold, it acts on RyRs, triggering the opening of homotetrameric channels, ultimately releasing ER-stored Ca2+ into the cytoplasm.

    TMCO1 is a transmembrane protein located on the ER, and its amino acid sequences is highly conserved, indicating that the physiological function of TMCO1 is evolutionally conserved[60]. This activation of RyR is activated by Ca2+ to release Ca2+ from the ER is also referred to CICR[ 59]. TMCO1 detects ER Ca2+ overload and actively regulates ER Ca2+ content. TMCO1 is able to sense the ER Ca2+ overload state in the ER, which lead to TMCO1 dimerization and the formation of tetrameric Ca2+ channels assemblies, facilitating the release of excess Ca2+ from the ER. When ER Ca2+ returns to resting levels, the TMCO1 tetramer depolymerizes into a dimeric state and monomeric state, terminating Ca2+ channel activity. this channel is also referred to as the Ca2+ load-activated Ca2+ channel (CLAC)[61].

    SERCA is a Ca2+ ATPase. Its main function is to transport excess cytoplasmic Ca2+ back into the ER for storage. A 1000-fold Ca2+ concentration gradient between the ER and cytoplasm is maintained, Which is critical for a variety of ER-dependent cellular functions, including protein synthesis, folding and export, nucleoplasmic transport, stress response, regulation of IP3, and SERCA expression. There is a strong link between ER stress and SERCA. Therefore, SERCA is essential in maintaining ER Ca2+ homeostasis. SERCA inhibitor induces ER stress and prevent the reuptake of Ca2+ into the ER, which enhances Ca2+ flux from the ER to mitochondria and promotes apoptosis. Additionally, a redox- active form of Selenoprotein N (SEPN1) interacts with SERCA at mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes (MAMS) to regulate ER Ca2+ levels[62]. Meanwhile, SEPN1 antagonizes oxidative damage that occurs during ER stress, which triggers the UPR. After UPR induction, the amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS) increases, and oxidized derivatives inactivate SERCA[62].

    TRP and SOCE exist not only in ER membrane, but also in cytoplasmic membrane. TRP is a non-selective cation permeable channel that maintains calcium balance in the cellular environment. The TRP superfamily has seven major subfamilies: TRPC, TRPV, RRPA, TRPM, TRPP, TRPML, and TRPN. In addition, some findings suggest that TRP activity is also associated with the regulation of UPR pathway. There are six types of channels in TRPV family. Among them, TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPV3 and TRPV4 are found in ER, whereas TRPV5 and TRPV6 are highly selective Ca2+ channels. In addition, TRPV channels interact with three ER stress receptors to induce an UPR, thereby reducing ER stress and protecting cells[64]. In most tissues, TRPV acts as a sensor for different stimuli (eg, heat, pressure, and PH) and contribute to electrolyte homeostasis, barrier function maintenance, and cell development[63]. In human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, inducing of ER stress using thapsigargin (TG) and tunicamycin(TM) resulted in increased expression of TRPV6 via the ATF6α signaling branch. Additionally the signaling pathway downstream of TRPV6 is the MAPK-JNK pathway. Activation of Store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) rapidly triggers the activation of Ca2+ channels in the cytoplasmic membrane when the ER is depleted of Ca2+, allowing extracellular Ca2+ to enter. Overexpression of TRPV6 attenuates apoptosis induced by ER stress in HESC-CMs cells[65]. The electrophysiological characterization of SOCE channels identifies them as Ca2+ release- activated channels (CRAC)[66]. CRAC is activative is believed to follow an ordered process. Participants in the SOCE process are stromal interacting molecule (STIM) and Orai. Orai, an essential component of the CRAC channel, is a cytoplasmic membrane protein with four transmembrane structural domains that from the channel pore. STIM1 is a single transmembrane protein located on the ER membrane with its N-terminus in the ER lumen that regulates CRAC channels by sensing changes in ER Ca2+ concentration. First, the concentration of Ca2+ in the ER lumen decreases. Then the Ca2+ sensor STIMl, through binding and dissociation with Ca2+ in the ER lumen, undergo conformational changes and migrates to the contact site between the ER and the cytoplasmic membrane. STIMl must first coupl to the C terminal the Orai l to act as a bridge. It then interacts with the N terminal of the Orai l and finally activates the Orai l Ca2+ channel, allowing Ca2+ influx. It has been reported that the UPR receptor IRE1α interacts with STIM1, promotes ER-plasma membrane contact sites, and enhances SOCE, ultimately leading to decreased T cell activation. Under ER stress, the IRE1α-STIM1 axis maintains immune cell function by promoting SOCE, and this study also reveals a potential pathway for cancer immunotherapy [68]. SOCE maintains adequate Ca2+ levels in the ER lumen during Ca2+ signaling, and disruption of ER Ca2+ homeostasis activates the UPR to restore protein homeostasis [67].

    The imbalance in ER Ca2+ homeostasis consists of two aspects: Ca2+ depletion and Ca2+ overload. Ca2+ uptake from the cytoplasm into the ER is mediated by SERCA. TG, a SERCA inhibitor, causes Ca2+ leakage from the ER, leading to ER dysfunction and activation of the UPR[69]. IP3R is activated through GPCR-mediated activation of PLC, which produces IP3. Sustained Ca2+ leakage from the ER is mediated by a range of proteins, such as Sec61 or Bcl-2. Upon depletion of ER Ca2+ stores, dissociation of Ca2+ from STIM proteins leads to STIM oligomerization and interaction with the plasma membrane Ca2+ channel Orai, increasing Ca2+ influx from the extracellular space. In addition to inducing SOCE, prolonged ER Ca2+ depletion is also a potent inducer of ER stress and will lead to destabilization of the ER, misfolding of proteins, and activation of the three branches of the UPR. SERCA is localized in the ER- PM Ca2+ microregion, allowing the ER Ca2+ store to be replenished repopulate[70, 71]. Within the physiological range, when the ER is depleted of Ca2+, the occupancy of Ca2+-binding sites decrease, which may, in turn, affect protein folding[72]. Fine-tuning the UPR response determines whether cells survive or apoptosis under ER stress[70]. Under ER Stress, unfolded proteins displace UPR sensor-bound BIPs, leading to activation of the UPR pathway. During ER Ca2+ depletion, the relative acceleration of ADT to ATP exchange promotes substrate release, leading to BIP dissociation from the UPR sensor. Bip, a particularly important Ca2+-binding protein, is involved in sensing the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER and regulates the UPR together with three ER transmembrane proteins; ATF6, IREI and PERK. BIP also plays an important role as a Ca2+ buffering protein in the ER. In addition, It is now generally accepted that ER Ca2+ depletion leads to ER stress. At high Ca2+ concentrations, on the other hand, BIP stabilizes its interaction with nascent polypeptides[72, 73]. However ER Ca2+ overload is also an crucial factor. TMCO1 acts as a Ca2+ overload-activated ion channel in the ER. Defects in TMCO1 lead to Ca2+ overload, providing a useful cellular model to study the effect of ER Ca2+ overload on ER stress. ER Ca2+ overload occurs in various diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, ischemic stroke, abnormal bone development and oral disease[74]. It has been found that in mouse granulosa cells, deletion of TMCO1 protein leads to ER Ca2+ overload, which ER stress[75]. Further studies showed that overloaded ER Ca2+ in TMCO1-deficient cells lead to the BIP dissociation from IRE1α and promote IRE1α dimerization , thereby enhancing promoting the IRE1 αactivation[74].

    ER mitochondrial contact sites (MAMs) and Ca2+ homeostasis

    In addition, there are dynamic membrane contact sites (ER-Mitochondrial contact sites) between the ER and mitochondria, which function as a dynamic platform called MAMs. Through the MAM structure, the ER is able to transmit appropriate Ca2+ signals to the mitochondria. At MAMs, SERCA transports Ca2+ from the cytoplasm to the ER, and IP3Rs and RyRs release Ca2+ from the ER, leading to a rapid increase in intracellular Ca2+. The mitochondria interpret these signals and use them as a specific input to regulate basic cellular functions. MAMs are key regions for Ca2+ transport. Glucose regulatory protein 75(GRP75) links IP3R, a channel responsible for calcium efflux from the ER, to the mitochondrial voltage-dependent ion channel VDAC1 to regulate mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake. ER-mitochondrial interactions are physiologically important in the regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis. Ca2+ released from the ER passes through the outer mitochondrial membrane via the VDAC1 channel, reaches the intermembrane space, and is transferred to the mitochondrial matrix via the mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU) complex. The study of ER-mitochondrial interactions and Ca2+ homeostasis will be highly significant for understanding the pathogenesis of related diseases and developing effective prevention and treatment strategies[76]. Imbalance of Ca2+ homeostasis between these organelles contribute to various physiological and pathological processes, Many cancer-associated factors are linked to Ca2+ regulated proteins localized in MAMs.

    Ⅲ. ER stress and Ca2+ regulation in oral diseases

    1. Salivary gland diseases

    Salivary glands secrete saliva in the mouth, which aids in taste perception, food chewing, and digestion of starches and lipids. For optimal oral health, a basal flow of saliva must be maintained to protect the mouth from bacterial infections, regulate the pH level, maintain the integrity of the oral mucosa, and keep the mouth clean. The key event in fluid secretion is the increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) caused by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) via IP3 receptor (IP3R)-induced Ca2+ release from the ER. However, abnormal Ca2+ signaling in the salivary glands can lead to oral dryness, loss of taste, salivation disorders, and other oral diseases[77]. IP3Rs determine the site and mode of initiation of intracellular [Ca2+]i signaling. However, Ca2+ entry into the cell is essential to sustain [Ca2+]i elevation and fluid secretion, which is mediated by the SOCE mechanism. Orai1, TRPC1, TRPC3 and STIM1 are identified as key components of SOCE in these cells. It has been found that SERCA activity is inhibited in the submandibular gland of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Cells finely regulate the generation and amplification of [Ca2+]i signaling to maintain cellular function. As a result, ER Ca2+ and IP3-induced increases in cytoplasimic Ca2+ are reduced[78]. A reduction in ER Ca2+ leads to improper post-translational processing, protein folding and ER proteins export[79]. Unregulated [Ca2+]i signaling can directly lead to cellular damage, dysfunction, and disease. This could explain the reduced salivary protein content and amylase activity. Abnormal [Ca2+]i signaling can exacerbate and accelerate cellular damage. These defects are associated with altered function or expression of key Ca2+ signaling components, such as STIM proteins and TRP channels. This Ca2+ signaling defect has been described in the salivary glands in association with radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction and autoimmune ectodermal gland disease, Sjögren's syndrome. These studies provide new avenues for investigating the underlying mechanisms of disease while aiding in the developing new clinical targets and therapeutic strategies[78].

    2. Gingival and periodontal disease

    Chronic inflammatory periodontal disease manifests clinically as two distinct forms;gingivitis and periodontitis. Gingivitis is caused by a bacterial biofilm that accumulates on the teeth near the gums. As the mildest form of periodontal disease, gingivitis does not cause attachment loss and can be reversed with proper treatment. However, periodontitis leads to loss of connective tissue and bone support, and the pathogenesis of periodontal disease is thought to be infection-induced inflammatory tissue destruction. At the site of tissue destruction, proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, as well as inflammatory mediators, are elevated. In addition, various enzymes (and their inhibitors) involved in matrix degradation and alveolar bone resorption are increased[80]. In patients with periodontitis, antibody synthesis is significantly upregulated in gingival lesions. Due to accelerated protein synthesis, the transcriptional upregulation of these molecules may induce ER stress via the UPR or ER activation. The UPR enables cells to reduce burden unfolded proteins in the ER through translational attenuation, transcriptional induction of ER chaperones, and the degradation of misfolded proteins. In Gram-positive bacteria, peptidoglycan (PGN) makes up 90% of the bacterial cell wall, and PGN is an important bacterial component in periodontal disease. Cells that are unable to cope with ER stress undergo apoptosis[69]. PGN-induced Ca2+ signaling triggers the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-8 (IL-8). It has been found that PGN induces an increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels through the PLC/IP3 pathway, which in turn enhances IL-8 mRNA expression. Furthermore, IL-8 mRNA expression is dependent on intracellular Ca2+ levels in human gingival epithelial cells. The development and application of intracellular Ca2+ inhibitors may provide novel therapeutic for approaches of periodontal disease[81].

    3. Oral squamous cell carcinoma

    Oral cancer is the sixth most common type of cancer worldwide, With Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) accounting for approximately 90% of cases. The tongue is the most common site of OSCC, followed by the lips. OSCC is highly aggressive, with high morbidity and mortality rates. Currently, surgery alone or in combination with radiotherapy or chemotherapy is the primary treatment option for OSCC patients[82]. However, these treatments can lead to facial disfigurement and impair affect eating and speech function. Despite treatment the prognosis for OSCC remains poor, as evidenced by high rates of recurrence, metastasis, and drug resistance[83]. Some mechanisms, such as ER stress, can regulate apoptotic signaling. Thus, the search for novel therapeutic strategies for OSCC is crucial. Under pathological conditions or drug-induced Ca2+ metabolism disorders, ER stress and UPR may be triggered due to the Ca2+-dependent function of ER molecular chaperones. ER stress is strongly associated with tumor progression. It has been found that Asiatic acid (AA) treatment significantly increases intracellular Ca2+ levels and calpain expression in tongue cancer cells[42]. Studies have found that ER stress induces apoptosis in various cancer cells, including malignant melanoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, cervical cancer and squamous cells carcinoma[84]. Capsazepine (CPZ) also sensitizes OSCC cells and other cancer types to apoptosis[85]. AA treatment upregulated Grp78 expression and enhance IRE1α and JNK phosphorylation in tongue cancer cells, suggesting that AA induces apoptosis through activation of the ER Grp78/IRE1α/JNK signaling pathway. One study[86] using capsazepine (CIDD-99) not only reduced Ca2+ entry, but also lowered ER Ca2+ levels, inducing ER stress and leading to apoptosis in oral cancer cells. Additionally, mitochondrial function was also found to be inhibited by CIDD-99, which may be due to loss of calcium homeostasis. Recent studies have shown that ER-mitochondrial crosstalk play a crucial role in determining cell fate by regulating mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis and metabolism[87].

    4. DSSP and ER stress in OSCC

    Dentin salivary phosphoprotein (DSPP) is up regulated in various human cancers, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer cells are typically experience chronic ER stress due to genetic mutations and stressful microenvironments leading to increase levels of misfolded proteins. It has been suggested that DSPP silencing may disrupt of ER Ca2+ homeostasis in OSCC cells. DSPP silencing resulted in decreased expression of Bcl2 and PCNA, while increasing in Bax and cytochrome C levels. Downregulation of DSPP has been shown to decrease cell proliferation and increase apoptosis in OSCC cancer cells. In addition, ER stress enhances Bax translocation and insertion into the ER membrane, while Bax or Bak upregulation induces ER Ca2+ efflux and cytochrome c release from mitochondria. In conclusion, a detailed understanding of how cancer cells survive under ER Stress may aid in development of better therapeutic strategies for OSCC. Down-regulation of DSPP in OSCC cells affects major ER stress-related proteins (GRP78, SERCA2b, and UPR sensor proteins), leading to UPR disfunction and systemic failure[88].

    5. Odontodysplasia

    Enamel formation is a complex process that is tightly regulated by enamel-forming cells. Traditionally, Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) has been studied from the perspective that mutations in genes encoding secreted enamel matrix proteins affect proteins function and behavior within the extracellular matrix. The correct spatial pattern of enamel matrix protein (EMP) expression is essential for coordinated enamel crystal formation, which depends on a strong calcium ions supply[89]. It has been demonstrated that stimulation of LS8 cells or mouse primary enamel organoids with TG to activate SOCE resulted in increased expression of Amelx, Ambn, Enam, and Mmp20. However, recent finding suggest that AI may also be associated with intracellular phenomena, particularly ER stress and UPR activation in enamel- forming cells under certain conditions[90]. LS8 cells express the CRAC channel components STIM and ORAI1. Activation of SOCE by ER Ca2+ depletion cause a conformational change of Ca2+ sensors in ER STIM1 to aggregate in specific regions of the ER (called puncta). This effect is reversed when cells are treated with CRAC channel inhibitors. Ca2+ endocytosis is reported to be virtually eliminated in LS8 cells pretreated with pharmacological CRAC channel inhibitors, suggesting that SOCE in LS8 cells is mediated by CRAC channels. This suggests that Ca2+ influx is mediated by CRAC channels in LS8 cells and enamel organoids, and that Ca2+ signaling enhances the EMPs expression[89]. These findings are consistent with the observation of severely hypocalcified enamel in patients with mutations in the CRAC channel genes STIM1 and ORAI1. Ca2+ plays an essential role not only in enamel mineralization but also in regulating the EMPs expression. Excessive fluoride consumption can lead to dental fluorosis. Studies have shown that in enamel cells, fluoride exposure affects the function of the ER-localized Ca2+ channel IP3R and the activity of the sarco-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) pump during Ca2+ refilling [91].

    6. Temporomandibular joint disorders

    Temporomandibular Joint disease (TMD) is an osteoarthritis (OA)-like condition characterized by cartilage thinning, followed by subchondral bone erosion, synovitis, and chronic pain. Therefore, cartilage thinning is considered a key event in the onset and progression of TMD. Studies using in vivo and in vitro models have found that mechanical stress can induce ER stress in mandibular chondrocytes. ER stress as well as ER stress-mediated apoptosis can be mitigated by inhibiting IP3R and RyR, suggesting that Ca2+ signaling plays a critical role in mechanical stress-mediated chondrocyte apoptosis and cartilage thinning[92]. Recent studies have found that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/ Akt pathway plays an important role in the regulation of chondrocyte apoptosis and survival and may help prevent OA. Therefore, novel drug targets are being investigated for the treatment of TMD. In addition, hypoxia-inducible factor-2α(HIF2α) activatesβ-catenin and nuclear factor- KB(NF-kB) pathways to promote chondrocyte apoptosis. However, the crosstalk between these pathways remains unclear. Further studies are required to explore Ca2+ independent mechanisms[93].

    Ⅳ. TREATMENT

    1. Photobiomodulation

    Photobiomodulation (PBM), also known as low-level laser therapy, involves the interaction of specific wavelengths of natural or artificial light with living cells to trigger various biological Responses. It is non-invasive and widely used. In recent years, red or near-infrared (NIR) applications have been among the most widely used light sources, with wavelengths ranging from 620nm to 670 nm. PBM is utilized for irradiation therapy to relieve pain, reduce inflammation, and accelerate wound healing. It is absorbed by cytochrome C oxidase (CCO), the terminal enzyme of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, which produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)[94]. Low-intensity NIR light irradiation has been reported to reduce intracellular Ca2+ overload and decrease ER stress. Treatment with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) at 850 nm reduces high glucose-induced intracellular Ca2+ overload and ER stress via downregulation of Caspase-12 and CHOP. In addition, ROS production, which activates Ca2+ release from the ER, is considered a potential light-dependent signaling pathway[95-97]. Further comparisons using 650nm light irradiation revealed that low-intensity light at 650nm rapidly increased intracellular Ca2+ in neuronal cells by 88% within the first 1-2 minutes, followed by decrease. Zhang et al used the human mast cell line HMC-1 to demonstrate that 640 nm RED light irradiation increase intracellular Ca2+ concentration and activate TRPV2 leading to Ca2+ channel opening[98].

    2. Calcium Targeted Therapy

    Calcium Targeted Therapy considered a novel approach in tumor therapy [99]. This strategy involves the use of exogenous Ca2+ and multimodal endogenous Ca2+ regulation through two main mechanisms. Exogenous Ca2+ sources include calcium carbonate (CaCO3), calcium phosphate (Ca3(Po4)2), and calcium peroxide (Cao2). These nanomaterials exhibit high transport capacity and can be modified for targeted delivery to tumor site. Endogenous Ca2+ regulation involves modulating Ca2+ channels, membrane integrity, and ER stress. However, the ability of tumor cells to buffer intracellular Ca2+ concentrations via Ca2+ pumps and ER Ca2+ stores significantly limits the effectiveness of Calcium targeted therapy.

    Ⅴ. CONCLUSION and EXPECTATION

    ER stress and Ca2+ homeostasis are intricately connected. Ca2+ not only play a key role in signaling for ER stress but also influences cellular physiological responses by regulating the ER Ca2+ balance. When the ER is subjected to stress, Ca2+ release increase, from the ER, which process not only activates the ER stress pathway, but also regulate apoptosis and survival decisions through Ca2+-dependent signaling mechanisms. As research progresses, growing evidence suggest that the ER stress and Ca2+ homeostasis play an crucial role in the onset and progression various oral diseases. For example, abnormal release of Ca2+ may promote the malignant growth in oral cancer cells or intensity localized inflammatory responses in periodontal disease. In oral diseases, ER stress exacerbates tissue damage through Ca2+ imbalance. ER stress and Ca2+ dysregulation significantly impact on the development and progression of oral diseases. Therefore, modulation of ER stress and Ca2+ homeostasis may serve as an effective strategy for oral diseases.

    In the future, Targeting ER stress and Ca2+ imbalance may provide new breakthroughs in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases. By working together to regulate cellular function and immune responses, they influence pathophysiology of condition such as oral cancer, periodontal disease, and dental caries. Further in-depth study on their mechanism will provide new theoretical basis and therapeutic targets for clinical application.

    Figure

    KAOMP-49-3-55_F1.gif

    ER stress and UPR. UPR related signal path. Under physiological conditions, the binding of BIP and UPR receptor is inhibited. Under ER stress, BIP dissociates from the UPR receptor (IRE1α, ATF6, PERK), leaving it in an activated state, mediating downstream signaling pathways.

    KAOMP-49-3-55_F2.gif

    Ca2+ homeostasis can't be maintained without Ca2+ release channels and transporters of Ca2+. ER stress can be caused by Ca2+ depletion or Ca2+ overload in the ER, and Ca2+ channels may help Ca2+ return to ER.

    Table

    Reference

    1. Schwarz DS, Blower MD: The endoplasmic reticulum: structure, function and response to cellular signaling[J]. Cell Mol Life Sci 2016;73:79-94.
    2. Zhou Y, Murugan DD, Khan H: Roles and Therapeutic Implications of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Oxidative Stress in Cardiovascular Diseases[J]. Antioxidants (Basel), 2021;10:8.
    3. Ron D, Walter P: Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007;8:519-529.
    4. Corazzari M, Gagliardi M, Fimia GM: Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, Unfolded Protein Response, and Cancer Cell Fate[J]. Front Oncol 2017;7:78.
    5. Williams CL: Kazutoshi Mori and Peter Walter receive the 2014 Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award[J]. J Clin Invest 2014;124:4138-4142.
    6. Almanza A, Carlesso A, Chintha C: Endoplasmic reticulum stress signalling - From basic mechanisms to clinical applications[ J]. FEBS J 2019;286:241-278.
    7. Karagoz GE, Acosta-Alvear D, Walter P: The unfolded protein response: Detecting and responding to fluctuations in the protein-folding capacity of the endoplasmic reticulum[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2019;11:9.
    8. Sano R, Reed JC: ER stress-induced cell death mechanisms[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013;1833:3460-3470.
    9. Bollo M, Paredes RM, Holstein D: Calcineurin interacts with PERK and dephosphorylates calnexin to relieve ER stress in mammals and frogs[J]. PLoS One 2010;5:e11925.
    10. Romito O, Gueguinou M, Raoul W, et al: Calcium signaling: A therapeutic target to overcome resistance to therapies in cancer[J]. Cell Calcium 2022;108:102673.
    11. Mekahli D, Bultynck G, Parys JB: Endoplasmic-reticulum calcium depletion and disease[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2011;3:6.
    12. Sammels E, Parys JB, Missiaen L: Intracellular Ca2+ storage in health and disease: A dynamic equilibrium[J]. Cell Calcium 2010;47:297-314.
    13. Makio T, Chen J, Simmen T: ER stress as a sentinel mechanism for ER Ca(2+) homeostasis[J]. Cell Calcium 2024;124:102961.
    14. Yamada H, Nakajima T, Domon H: Endoplasmic reticulum stress response and bone loss in experimental periodontitis in mice[J]. J Periodontal Res 2015;50:500-508.
    15. Kaira K, Toyoda M, Shimizu A: Expression of ER stress markers (GRP78/BiP and PERK) in adenoid cystic carcinoma[J]. Acta Otolaryngol 2016;136:1-7.
    16. Liu J, Yang H, Zhang H: Biomechanically reduced expression of Derlin-3 is linked to the apoptosis of chondrocytes in the mandibular condylar cartilage via the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway[J]. Arch Oral Biol 2020;118:104843.
    17. Lievremont JP, Rizzuto R, Hendershot L: BiP, a major chaperone protein of the endoplasmic reticulum lumen, plays a direct and important role in the storage of the rapidly exchanging pool of Ca2+[J]. J Biol Chem 1997;272:30873-30879.
    18. Hwang J, Qi L: Quality control in the Endoplasmic reticulum: Crosstalk between ERAD and UPR pathways[J]. Trends Biochem Sci 2018;43:593-605.
    19. Travers KJ, Patil CK, Wodicka L: Functional and genomic analyses reveal an essential coordination between the unfolded protein response and ER-associated degradation[J]. Cell 2000;101:249-258.
    20. Vidal RL, Sepulveda D, Troncoso-Escudero P: Enforced dimerization between XBP1s and ATF6f enhances the protective effects of the UPR in models of neurodegeneration[J]. Mol Ther 2021;29:1862-1882.
    21. Shoulders MD, Ryno LM, Genereux JC: Stress-independent activation of XBP1s and/or ATF6 reveals three functionally diverse ER proteostasis environments[J]. Cell Rep 2013;3:1279-1292.
    22. Shore GC, Papa FR, Oakes SA: Signaling cell death from the endoplasmic reticulum stress response[J]. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011;23:143-149.
    23. Bertolotti A, Zhang Y, Hendershot LM: Dynamic interaction of BiP and ER stress transducers in the unfolded-protein response[J]. Nat Cell Biol 2000;2:326-332.
    24. Chen L, Bi M, Zhang Z: The functions of IRE1alpha in neurodegenerative diseases: Beyond ER stress[J]. Ageing Res Rev 2022;82:101774.
    25. Yoshida H, Matsui T, Yamamoto A: XBP1 mRNA is induced by ATF6 and spliced by IRE1 in response to ER stress to produce a highly active transcription factor[J]. Cell 2001;107:881-891.
    26. Han D, Lerner AG, Vande WL: IRE1alpha kinase activation modes control alternate endoribonuclease outputs to determine divergent cell fates[J]. Cell 2009;138:562-575.
    27. Park SM, Kang TI, So JS: Roles of XBP1s in Transcriptional Regulation of Target Genes[J]. Biomedicines 2021;9:7.
    28. Hollien J, Weissman JS: Decay of endoplasmic reticulum- localized mRNAs during the unfolded protein response[ J]. Science 2006;313:104-107.
    29. Tirasophon W, Lee K, Callaghan B: The endoribonuclease activity of mammalian IRE1 autoregulates its mRNA and is required for the unfolded protein response[J]. Genes Dev 2000;14:2725-2736.
    30. Harding HP, Zhang Y, Ron D: Protein translation and folding are coupled by an endoplasmic-reticulum-resident kinase[J]. Nature 1999;397:271-274.
    31. Ron D: Translational control in the endoplasmic reticulum stress response[J]. J Clin Invest 2002;110:1383-1388.
    32. Harding HP, Novoa I, Zhang Y: Regulated translation initiation controls stress-induced gene expression in mammalian cells[J]. Mol Cell 2000:6:1099-1108.
    33. Marciniak SJ, Garcia-Bonilla L, Hu J: Activation-dependent substrate recruitment by the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 kinase PERK[J]. J Cell Biol 2006;172:201-209.
    34. Novoa I, Zeng H, Harding HP: Feedback inhibition of the unfolded protein response by GADD34-mediated dephosphorylation of eIF2alpha[J]. J Cell Biol 2001;153(5):1011-1022.
    35. Cullinan SB, Diehl JA: PERK-dependent activation of Nrf2 contributes to redox homeostasis and cell survival following endoplasmic reticulum stress[J]. J Biol Chem 2004;279:20108-20117.
    36. Haze K, Yoshida H, Yanagi H: Mammalian transcription factor ATF6 is synthesized as a transmembrane protein and activated by proteolysis in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress[J]. Mol Biol Cell 1999;10:3787-3799.
    37. Yamamoto K, Sato T, Matsui T: Transcriptional induction of mammalian ER quality control proteins is mediated by single or combined action of ATF6alpha and XBP1[J]. Dev Cell 2007;13:365-376.
    38. Lerner AG, Upton JP, Praveen PV: IRE1alpha induces thioredoxin-interacting protein to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and promote programmed cell death under irremediable ER stress[J]. Cell Metab 2012;16:250-264.
    39. Upton JP, Wang L, Han D: IRE1alpha cleaves select microRNAs during ER stress to derepress translation of proapoptotic Caspase-2[J]. Science 2012;338:818-822.
    40. Urano F, Wang X, Bertolotti A: Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1[J]. Science 2000;287:664-666.
    41. Li J, Chen K, Huang J: Asiatic acid induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and activates the Grp78/IRE1alpha/JNK and calpain pathways to inhibit tongue cancer growth[J]. Front Pharmacol 2021;12:690612.
    42. Tobiume K, Saitoh M, Ichijo H: Activation of apoptosis signal- regulating kinase 1 by the stress-induced activating phosphorylation of pre-formed oligomer[J]. J Cell Physiol 2002;191:95-104.
    43. Mccullough KD, Martindale JL, Klotz LO: Gadd153 sensitizes cells to endoplasmic reticulum stress by down-regulating Bcl2 and perturbing the cellular redox state[J]. Mol Cell Biol 2001;21:1249-1259.
    44. Marciniak SJ, Yun CY, Oyadomari S: CHOP induces death by promoting protein synthesis and oxidation in the stressed endoplasmic reticulum[J]. Genes Dev 2004;18:3066-3077.
    45. Qiao Q, Sun C, Han C: Endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway PERK-eIF2alpha confers radioresistance in oropharyngeal carcinoma by activating NF- kappaB[J]. Cancer Sci 2017;108:1421-1431.
    46. Yang H, Niemeijer M, van de Water B: ATF6 Is a Critical Determinant of CHOP Dynamics during the Unfolded Protein Response[J]. iScience 2020;23:100860.
    47. Jiang X, Jiang H, Shen Z: Activation of mitochondrial protease OMA1 by Bax and Bak promotes cytochrome c release during apoptosis[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:14782-14787.
    48. Bouman L, Schlierf A, Lutz AK: Parkin is transcriptionally regulated by ATF4: Evidence for an interconnection between mitochondrial stress and ER stress[J]. Cell Death Differ 2011;18:769-782.
    49. Duplan E, Giaime E, Viotti J: ER-stress-associated functional link between Parkin and DJ-1 via a transcriptional cascade involving the tumor suppressor p53 and the spliced X-box binding protein XBP-1[J]. J Cell Sci 2013;126(Pt 9):2124-2133.
    50. Scortegagna M, Kim H, Li JL: Fine tuning of the UPR by the ubiquitin ligases Siah1/2[J]. PLoS Genet 2014;10:e1004348.
    51. Arensdorf AM, Dezwaan MD, Kaufman RJ: Temporal clustering of gene expression links the metabolic transcription factor HNF4alpha to the ER stress-dependent gene regulatory network[J]. Front Genet 2013;4:188.
    52. Coe H, Michalak M: Calcium binding chaperones of the endoplasmic reticulum[J]. Gen Physiol Biophys 2009;28 Spec No Focus:F96-F103.
    53. Berridge MJ, Bootman MD, Roderick HL. Calcium signalling: Dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003;4:517-529.
    54. Fedorenko OA, Popugaeva E, Enomoto M: Intracellular calcium channels: Inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors[J]. Eur J Pharmacol 2014;739:39-48.
    55. Ma Y, Hendershot LM: ER chaperone functions during normal and stress conditions[J]. J Chem Neuroanat 2004;28:51-65.
    56. Newton AC, Bootman MD, Scott JD: Second Messengers[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2016;8:8.
    57. Taylor CW, Tovey SC: IP(3) receptors: Toward understanding their activation[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010;2:a4010.
    58. Sorrentino V: The ryanodine receptor family of intracellular calcium release channels[J]. Adv Pharmacol 1995;33:67-90.
    59. Xin B, Puffenberger EG, Turben S: Homozygous frameshift mutation in TMCO1 causes a syndrome with craniofacial dysmorphism, skeletal anomalies, and mental retardation[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:258-263.
    60. Meissner G: Molecular regulation of cardiac ryanodine receptor ion channel[J]. Cell Calcium 2004;35:621-628.
    61. Wang QC, Zheng Q, Tan H: TMCO1 Is an ER Ca(2+) Load-Activated Ca(2+) Channel[J]. Cell 2016;165:1454-1466.
    62. Marino M, Stoilova T, Giorgi C: SEPN1, an endoplasmic reticulum- localized selenoprotein linked to skeletal muscle pathology, counteracts hyperoxidation by means of redox- regulating SERCA2 pump activity[J]. Hum Mol Genet 2015;24:1843-1855.
    63. Vestuto V, Di Sarno V, Musella S: New Frontiers on ER Stress Modulation: Are TRP channels the leading actors?[J]. Int J Mol Sci 2022;24.
    64. Haustrate A, Prevarskaya N, Lehen'Kyi V: Role of the TRPV channels in the endoplasmic reticulum calcium homeostasis[J]. Cells 2020;9:2.
    65. Li Z, Meng Z, Lu J: TRPV6 protects ER stress-induced apoptosis via ATF6alpha-TRPV6-JNK pathway in human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes[J]. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2018;120:1-11.
    66. Jousset H, Frieden M, Demaurex N: STIM1 knockdown reveals that store-operated Ca2+ channels located close to sarco/endoplasmic Ca2+ ATPases (SERCA) pumps silently refill the endoplasmic reticulum[J]. J Biol Chem 2007;282:11456-11464.
    67. Carreras-Sureda A, Zhang X, Laubry L: The ER stress sensor IRE1 interacts with STIM1 to promote store-operated calcium entry, T cell activation, and muscular differentiation[J]. Cell Rep 2023;42:113540.
    68. Zheng H, Zhou MH, Hu C: Differential roles of the C and N termini of Orai1 protein in interacting with stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) for Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ (CRAC) channel activation[J]. J Biol Chem 2013;288:11263-11272.
    69. Xu C, Bailly-Maitre B, Reed JC: Endoplasmic reticulum stress: cell life and death decisions[J]. J Clin Invest 2005;115:2656-2664.
    70. Carreras-Sureda A, Pihan P, Hetz C: Calcium signaling at the endoplasmic reticulum: Fine-tuning stress responses[J]. Cell Calcium 2018;70:24-31.
    71. Krebs J, Agellon LB, Michalak M: Ca(2+) homeostasis and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress: An integrated view of calcium signaling[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2015;460:114-121.
    72. Preissler S, Rato C, Yan Y: Calcium depletion challenges endoplasmic reticulum proteostasis by destabilising BiP-substrate complexes[J]. Elife 2020;9.
    73. Shen J, Chen X, Hendershot L: ER stress regulation of ATF6 localization by dissociation of BiP/GRP78 binding and unmasking of Golgi localization signals[J]. Dev Cell 2002;3:99-111.
    74. Zhao S, Feng H, Jiang D: ER Ca(2+) overload activates the IRE1alpha signaling and promotes cell survival[J]. Cell Biosci 2023;13:123.
    75. Sun Z, Zhang H, Wang X: TMCO1 is essential for ovarian follicle development by regulating ER Ca(2+) store of granulosa cells[J]. Cell Death Differ 2018;25:1686-1701.
    76. Lee S, Min KT: The Interface Between ER and Mitochondria: Molecular Compositions and Functions[J]. Mol Cells 2018;41:1000-1007.
    77. Nicolau J, De Souza DN, Simoes A: Alteration of Ca(2+)-ATPase activity in the homogenate, plasma membrane and microsomes of the salivary glands of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats[J]. Cell Biochem Funct 2009;27:128-134.
    78. Ambudkar IS: Calcium signalling in salivary gland physiology and dysfunction[J]. J Physiol 2016;594:2813-2824.
    79. Fedirko NV, Kruglikov IA, Kopach OV: Changes in functioning of rat submandibular salivary gland under streptozotocin- induced diabetes are associated with alterations of Ca2+ signaling and Ca2+ transporting pumps[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1762:294-303.
    80. Ogawa T, Tarkowski A, Mcghee ML: Analysis of human IgG and IgA subclass antibody-secreting cells from localized chronic inflammatory tissue[J]. J Immunol 1989;142:1150-1158.
    81. Son A, Shin DM, Hong JH: Peptidoglycan induces the production of interleukin-8 via calcium signaling in human gingival epithelium[ J]. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 2015;19:51-57.
    82. Chatzistefanou I, Lubek J, Markou K: The role of neck dissection and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in cN0 patients with PNI-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity[J]. Oral Oncol 2014;50:753-758.
    83. Rao SK, Pavicevic Z, Du Z: Pro-inflammatory genes as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in oral squamous cell carcinoma[ J]. J Biol Chem 2010;285:32512-32521.
    84. Umemura M, Nakakaji R, Ishikawa Y: Physiological functions of calcium signaling via Orai1 in cancer[J]. J Physiol Sci 2023;73:21.
    85. Gonzales CB, Kirma NB, De La Chapa JJ: Vanilloids induce oral cancer apoptosis independent of TRPV1[J]. Oral Oncol 2014;50:437-447.
    86. Sun Y, Zboril EK, De La Chapa JJ: Inhibition of Ca(2+) entry by capsazepine analog CIDD-99 prevents oral squamous carcinoma cell proliferation[J]. Front Physiol 2022;13:969000.
    87. Missiroli S, Danese A, Iannitti T: Endoplasmic reticulum- mitochondria Ca(2+) crosstalk in the control of the tumor cell fate[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 2017;1864:858-864.
    88. Gkouveris I, Nikitakis NG, Aseervatham J: The tumorigenic role of DSPP and its potential regulation of the unfolded protein response and ER stress in oral cancer cells[J]. Int J Oncol 2018;53:1743-1751.
    89. Nurbaeva MK, Eckstein M, Snead ML: Store-operated Ca2+ entry modulates the expression of enamel genes[J]. J Dent Res 2015;94:1471-1477.
    90. Brookes SJ, Barron MJ, Dixon MJ: The unfolded protein response in amelogenesis and enamel pathologies[J]. Front Physiol 2017;8653.
    91. Aulestia FJ, Groeling J, Bomfim G: Fluoride exposure alters Ca(2+) signaling and mitochondrial function in enamel cells[J]. Sci Signal 2020;13:619.
    92. Zhou L, Wu F, Wang J: Effects of endoplasmic reticulum stress on chondrocyte apoptosis via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway[J]. Tissue Cell 2024;87:102340.
    93. de freitas LF, Hamblin MR: proposed mechanisms of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy[J]. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2016;22(3).
    94. Biswas R, Ahn JC, Moon JH: Low-level laser therapy with 850 nm recovers salivary function via membrane redistribution of aquaporin 5 by reducing intracellular Ca(2+) overload and ER stress during hyperglycemia[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2018;1862:1770-1780.
    95. Golovynska I, Golovynskyi S, Stepanov YV: Red and near-infrared light evokes Ca(2+) influx, endoplasmic reticulum release and membrane depolarization in neurons and cancer cells[J]. J Photochem Photobiol B 2021;214:112088.
    96. Huang YY, Nagata K, Tedford CE: Low-level laser therapy (810 nm) protects primary cortical neurons against excitotoxicity in vitro[J]. J Biophotonics, 2014;7:656-664.
    97. Wu ZH, Zhou Y, Chen JY: Mitochondrial signaling for histamine releases in laser-irradiated RBL-2H3 mast cells[J]. Lasers Surg Med 2010;42:503-509.
    98. Wang C, Peng J, Xiao Y: Advances in nanotherapeutics for tumor treatment by targeting calcium overload[J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2025;245:114190.
    오늘하루 팝업창 안보기 닫기