Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 1225-1577(Print)
ISSN : 2384-0900(Online)
The Korean Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Vol.42 No.2 pp.39-43
DOI : https://doi.org/10.17779/KAOMP.2018.42.2.003

Ameloblastoma Secondary to Third Molar Extraction and Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy : A Case Report

Sung-Tak Lee1), Santhiya Iswarya Vinothini Udayakumar1), Tae-Geon Kwon1), Hong-In Shin2), So-Young Choi1)*
1)Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University
2)Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University
Correspondence: So-Young Choi, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University Tel: +82-53-600-7561 E-mail: dentalchoi@knu.ac.kr
March 9, 2018 March 23, 2018 April 6, 2018

Abstract


Ameloblastoma is a benign odontogenic tumour of epithelial origin and comprises 1% of maxillomandibular tumors or cysts. The incidence of pathological changes such as ameloblastoma from the follicle of impacted third molar was reported to have low incidence. However, there are many reports that asymptomatic third molars are related with various pathological conditions. A case of ameloblastoma secondary to third molar extraction and subsequent sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) had not been reported. At the right ramus area, radiolucent lesion had been noted at 6 years after the surgical extraction of the third molar followed by SSRO for the mandibular prognathism. The lesion was proved to be the basal cell type ameloblastoma. There had been no significant bony lesion before or 1 year after the SSRO. The tumour was successfully removed and there was no evident recurrence at 4 year of the follow up after the removal of the ameloblastoma.



There are some reports suggesting the pathologic potential of the pericoronal tissues of impacted third molars to develop odontogenic keratocysts and ameloblastomas. The current case reports a rare possibility of ameloblastic change at the site of uneventful healing after third molar extraction and orthognathic surgery.



제 3 대구치 발치 및 하악시상지분할골절단술 후 발생한 법랑모세포종 : 증례보고

이 성탁1), 산 티야 아이스와리야 비노띠니 우다야크마르1), 권 대근1), 신 홍인2), 최 소영1)*
1)경북대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학 교실
2)경북대학교 치과의학전문대학 구강병리학 교실

초록


    Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION

    The pathologic potential of the pericoronal tissues of impacted third molars to develop cysts and tumours were reported in many cases. The possible pathology was found to be dentigerous cysts, followed by odontogenic keratocyst, and tumours like ameloblastoma1,3). There was a case report that even after 3.5 years of the surgical extraction of the third molar, amelobastoma had been found at the same site4). However, ameloblastoma secondary to third molar extraction and subsequent sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) had not been reported. In this case report, we describe

    In this case report, we describe our experience in the management of the ameloblastoma following SSRO procedure and reviewed the possible causes and treatment.

    Ⅱ. CASE REPORT

    A 30 year old female patient was presented with hypoplastic maxilla and prognathic mandible and impacted third molar teeth. The patient underwent extraction of the impacted third molar teeth at a local dental clinic. Five months later, Le Fort I osteotomy and SSRO had been planned to correct the facial deformities. There had been no pathological evidence of bony lesion at the extraction site of right mandibular 3rd molar before the orthognathic surgery (Fig 1. A). The postoperative healing was favourable after one year follow-up of two jaw surgery (Fig 1. B, C).

    At 6 years after the orthognathic surgery, the patient reported with a complaint of swelling and pain on the previous surgical site of SSRO on the right side. Radiographic findings revealed that the presence of a radiolucency on the right mandibular angle area with expansion and thinning of cortical plates (Fig 2) suggesting ameloblastoma. According to the histologic examination of Incisional biopsy, dentigerous cyst with ameloblastic changes was noted. Microscopically, stratified squamous epithelium composed of 3 to 5 cell layers and ameloblastomatic changes under the basal layer of widened epithelium lining.

    Based on initial pathological findings and radiographic features, marginal resection of a unilocular soft tissue mass (3.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 cm) had been performed and mandibular right second molar was extracted. The tumour was surgically removed clearly under general anaesthesia. Plate on the previous operation site was also removed and intermaxillary fixation was performed to prevent traumatic fracture for a week postoperatively. There was no evidence of recurrence after removal of the tumour at 4 years after the surgery (Fig 3). According to the permanent biopsy, the pathological specimen was proved to be the ameloblastoma (basal cell type). The specimen was composed of uniform basaloid cells and no stellated reticulum was seen in the central portion of the follicles (Fig 4).

    Ⅲ. DISCUSSION

    Surgical removal of impacted third molars is one of the most frequent procedures carried out in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Impacted (unerupted or partially erupted) third molars are familiar to be associated with the occurrence of pathological conditions. The most common type of cyst was dentigerous cyst whereas the most common tumours associated with the dental follicle of impacted third molars are ameloblastoma1). Epithelial odontogenic tumours and odontogenic cysts are derived from epithelial cells in the oral tissues such as remnants of odontogenic epithelium, dental follicles and the surface epithelium of the oral mucosa. Differences in the proliferation ratio of these oral epithelial cells may play an important role in the pathogenesis of epithelial tumors and odontogenic cysts5).

    Previous investigation on radiographic and immunohistochemical study revealed that odontogenic epithelium in dental follicle of unerupted third molars might be actively proliferating6). According to the analysis of 104 unerupted third molars, the incidence of pathological conditions such as odontogenic keratocyst and ameloblastoma was 1.92% and 0.96%2). Other report had shown that the incidence of ameloblastoma to develop around impacted third molar teeth has been reported as 0.27%3).

    The absence of symptoms related with impacted third molars does not correspond to the absence of pathology. It had been suggested that among the dental follicle from asymptomatic third moalrs, 23% had pathologic conditions. Clinically, there may be no signs or symptoms of cyst formation in asymptomatic impacted third molars7). Therefore, the decision to remove third molars prophylactically should be based on an evaluation of the balance between the probability of retained third molars causing problems in the future and the uncertainty or benefits of surgery carried out earlier compared with later3). However, the current report suggests that even after extraction of the third molar, there might be a possible development of secondary ameloblastoma.

    The SSRO is the most common and useful method to correct the mandibular deformities. Pathological process of the current case would be postulated as follows; the remnants of the epithelial lining from the previous dental follicle or dentigerous cyst of an impacted third molar tooth would be entrapped at the bony gap of SSRO and this might potentially be transformed into an ameloblastoma. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an ameloblstoma after the 3rd molar extraction and sagittal spit ramus osteoyomy.

    The current ameloblastoma had been diagnosed as “basal cell type” ameloblastoma, which is a very rare variant of ameloblastoma demonstrates the findings of cutaneous basaloid squamous cell carcinoma but has the pathological findings of conventional ameloblastoma8). Since the reported cases are very rare, recurrence rate had not been identified9). Based on the unique history of disease development and treatment course, long-term follow up would be needed.

    Ⅳ. CONCLUSION

    There had been some reports mentioning the pathologic potential of the pericoronal tissues of impacted third molars to develop pathological lesions. This case report emphasizes the long term follow up of the SSRO and a rare possibility of ameloblastic change at the site of uneventful healing following the orthognathic surgery and third molar extraction.

    Figure

    KAOMP-42-39_F1.gif

    There was no pathological lesion at the extraction site of right 3rd molar (A). Immediate (B) and 1-year postoperative (C) healing was uneventful after the orthognathic surgery.

    KAOMP-42-39_F2.gif

    Panoramic radiograph showed radiolucency on the right mandibular angle area at 6 years after orthognathic surgery. Axial and coronal CT scans showing expansion and thinning of cortical bone (B, C)

    KAOMP-42-39_F3.gif

    Preoperative intraoral photograph of the lesion (A). Immediate (B) and 1-year postoperative (C) panoramic view after removal of the lesion.

    KAOMP-42-39_F4.gif

    Histologic finding showed that the lesional tissue composed of uniform baseloid cells and no stellate reticulum was seen in the central portion of the follicles (A & B, x10 and X40 magnification).

    Table

    Reference

    1. Al-KhateebT.H. BatainehA.B. : Pathology associated with impacted mandibular third molars in a group of Jordanians. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.2006; 64: 1598-1602.
    2. RakprasitkulS. : Pathologic changes in the pericoronal tissues of unerupted third molars. Quintessence Int.2001; 32: 633-638.
    3. StathopoulosP. MezitisM. KappatosC. TitsinidesS. StylogianniE. : Cysts and tumors associated with impacted third molars: is prophylactic removal justified? J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.2001; 69: 405-408.
    4. ChindiaM.L. GuthuaS.W. MwanikiD.L. : Ameloblastoma after surgical removal of an impacted mandibular molar. A case report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. ? ? ? ; 20: 73-74.
    5. LeeS.K. KimY.S. : Current concepts and occurrence of epithelial odontogenic tumors: I. Ameloblastoma and adenomatoid odontogenic tumor. Korean J. Pathol.2013; 47: 191-202.
    6. CabbarF. GulerN. ComunogluN. SenciftK. CologluS. : Determination of potential cellular proliferation in the odontogenic epithelia of the dental follicle of the asymptomatic impacted third molars. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.2008; 66: 2004-2011.
    7. YildirimG. AtaogluH. MihmanliA. KizilogluD. AvundukM.C. : Pathologic changes in soft tissues associated with asymptomatic impacted third molars. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod.2008; 106: 14-18.
    8. GiraddiG.B. AnushaA.S. : Basal cell ameloblastoma-review of literature with report of three cases. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res.2012; 2: 53-56.
    9. SridharM. Bhaskar ReddyL.R. KharatS. MaheshB.S. GandiL. MahendraA. NigamP. GrewalP. : Basal cell ameloblastoma: a rare histological variant of an uncommon tumor. Niger. J. Surg.2015; 21: 66-69.
    오늘하루 팝업창 안보기 닫기