Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 1225-1577(Print)
ISSN : 2384-0900(Online)
The Korean Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Vol.41 No.2 pp.63-71
DOI : https://doi.org/10.17779/KAOMP.2017.41.2.002

Protein Expression Changes of Cellular Proliferation-Related Proteins in Murine Macrophages, RAW 264.7 Cells by Ddialyzed Coffee Extract Treatment

Cheol Soo Yoon, Suk Keun Lee*
Department of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, and Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung, Korea
Correspondence: Suk Keun Lee, Department of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, 123 Chibyun-dong, Gangneung, 210-702, Korea. +82-33-640-2228; +82-33-642-6410sukkeunlee@hanmail.net
March 7, 2017 April 12, 2017 April 14, 2017

Abstract

Coffee is one of the most familiar beverages to modern human adults, but its bio-physiological effect has not been clearly elucidated. It was known that more than one thousand chemicals were included in the ordinary coffee extract. Among them, the caffein and chlorogenic acid (caffeoylquinic acids) are most abundant and have been investigated by many authors so far. In order to know the real cellular effect of whole coffee extract elements, the dialyzed coffee extract (DCE)1) was made to get coffee elements less than 1000 Da molecular weight, which are freely absorable through gastrointestinal tract. It was directly treated in the culture of RAW 264.7 cells, a murine macrophage lineage. RAW 264.7 cells were treated with DCE equivalent to 2.5 cups of coffee (DCE-2.5), DCE-5, and DCE-10 for 12 hours, and their protein extracts were examined by histological observation and immunoprecipitation high performance liquid chromatography (IP-HPLC). RAW 264.7 cells differently expressed the proliferation-related proteins depending on the dose of DCE. DCE-2.5 and DCE-5 enhanced the cellular growth of RAW 264.7 cells by increasing the expression of β-actin, PCNA, Ki-67, MPM2, MAX, cMyc, E2F-1, and Rb-1, and by decreasing the expression of MAD and p21. These proliferation-related proteins were rarely affected by DCE-10. DCE-2.5 and DCE-5 induced the cellular proliferation of RAW 264.7 cells by the signaling of E2F-1 and cMyc, respectively, but these cellular effects almost disappeared in DCE-10. Therefore, it was presumed that the low dose of coffee, DCE-2.5 and DCE-5 might be effective for the proliferation of murine macrophages, RAW264.7 cells, contrast to the high dose of coffee, DCE-10. It was also suggested that the low dose of DCE-2.5 and DCE-5 be helpful to increase the innate immunity in vivo by increasing the cell number of macrophages in contrast to the high dose of DCE-10.


투석시킨 커피 추출액에 의한 RAW 264.7 세포의 증식-관련 단백질 발현변화

윤 철수, 이 석근*
강릉원주대학교 치과대학 병리학교실 및 구강과학 연구소

초록


    I.INTRODUCTION

    People usually drink coffee to enjoy the leisure time or to get a break from busy schedules or randomly at any time of the day. Either way, we should drink with caution and in moderate amounts, from a medical point of view. Recent results show that coffee consumption was associated with the lowering risk of several cancers, including liver, colorectal, mouth and throat, and breast cancer2-5). However, there appeared wide controversies about the biological effect of coffee elements, and many authors insisted that coffee drinking would differently affect individual health depending on its dose6-8).

    In the previous study, the dialyzed coffee extract (DCE), up to 40 μg/mL, showed no harmful effect on RAW 264.7 cells for 12 hours, rather it produced stimulatory effect on RAW 264.7 cells by increasing the cell number and enhancing the protein expression of β-actin and Ki-671). Therefore, it was confirmed that the DCE containing most low molecular elements of coffee extract was applicable to cell culture experiment without complicated purification procedures. Thereby, it was suggested that RAW 264.7 cells can be cultured with different dose of DCE, which are the equivalent to 2.5 cups (10 μg/mL), 5 cups (20 μg/mL) and 10 cups (40 μg/mL) of coffee for this study.

    Further biological investigation was performed in this study using the RAW 264.7 cell culture system to know the molecular mechanism of the cellular proliferation induced by DCE. And the protein expression changes of RAW 264.7 cells were assessed depending on the dose of DCE through precision protein expression method, immunoprecipitation high performance chromatography (IP-HPLC). As the accuracy of IP-HPLC has been approved to produce the data of protein expression level in less than 5% error range, the molecular signaling mechanism of DCE effect in RAW 264.7 cells could be assessed in this study.

    This study was aimed to elucidate the expression changes of proliferation-related proteins by different dose of DCE in RAW 264.7 cell culture. This study were statistically analyzed and discussed with reference to the published literature.

    II.MATERIALS and METHODS

    Dialyzed coffee extract (DCE) production and treatment

    The coffee beans (Coffea arabica L.) were roasted and treated with hot water to get the ordinary coffee drink, followed by the dialysis using cellulose bag (131492, Spectra/ Por, Spectrum, CA, USA) which filtrates small molecules less than 1000 Da as done in the previous study1). The dose of dialyzed coffee extract (DCE) equivalent to 2.5 cup of coffee (DCE-2.5), DCE-5, and DCE-10 was separately added in the culture medium of RAW 264.7 cell culture.

    RAW cell culture treatment with dialyzed coffee extract (DCE)

    RAW 264.7 cells (ATCC, USA), murine macrophage cell line, were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (WelGene Inc. Korea) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (WelGene Inc. Korea), 100 unit/mL penicillin, 100μg/mL streptomycine, 250ng/mL amphotericin B (WelGene Inc. Korea), at 5% CO2, 37.5°C. The cells were tested for mycoplasma on a regular basis to ensure that only mycoplasma-free cell lines were studied in the assays.

    During the active growth of RAW 264.7 cells, the experimental groups were treated with DCE-2.5, DCE-5, and DCE-10 for 12 hours separately, while the control group was treated with normal saline. After the cell culture, the RAW 264.7 cells were observed under phase contracts inverted microscope, and their digital images (x400) were captured by a digital camera (DP-70®, Olympus Co., Japan) and followed by statistical analysis using image analyzing program of IMT i-solution (ver 21.1, Vancouver, Canada).

    Immunoprecipitation HPLC analysis for the protein extract obtained from RAW 264.7 cell culture

    After 12 hours culture of RAW 264.7 cells treated with dialyzed coffee extract (DCE) equivalent to 2.5, 5, and 10 cups of coffee, DCE-2.5, DCE-5, and DCE-10, respectively, the RAW 264.7 cells were harvested with protein lysis buffer (0.3% SDS, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.3% β-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM EDTA) containing protein inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, USA). Then, the protein extracts were preserved in -70°C deep freezer to prevent further protein degradation.9)

    100μg of protein extract was applied to each immunoprecipitation procedure using protein A/G agarose column (Amicogen, Korea). The protein A/G agarose columns were separately pre-incubated with 1μg of each 25 different antisera, including β-actin, Ki-67, PCNA, MAX, cMyc, E2F-1, Rb-1, and MAD (SantaCruz Biotech. USA). Briefly, the protein samples were mixed with 5 mL binding buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM sodium vanadate, 0.2 mM PMSF and 0.5% NP-40), and incubated in the protein A/G agarose columns at 10°C for 1 hour. The columns were placed on the rotating stirrer during the incubation time. After washing each column with sufficient amount of PBS solution (pH 7.3, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 43 mM Na2HPO4-7H2O and 1.4 mM KH2PO4), the target protein was eluted with 150 μL IgG elution buffer (Pierce, USA). The immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by HPLC (1100 series, Agilent, USA) having a reverse phase column and micro-analytical detector system (SG Highteco, Korea), running with 0.15M NaCl, 20% acetonitryl solution at 0.4 mL/min for 30 min, and analyzed by UV spectroscope at 280 nm. Both control and experimental groups were simultaneously performed for the IP-HPLC. In the results of IP-HPLC, the sample protein peak areas (mAU*s) obtained from HPLC analysis were eliminated the antibody peak area (mAU*s) in the negative control, and recalculated into square root value to compare their protein expression levels between the experimental and control groups. All the square root values of protein peak areas were plotted into a graph (Fig. 3 and 4) depending on the characteristic protein groups.10)

    III.RESULTS

    RAW 264.7 cells, immortalized murine macrophages, treated with DCE showed different expressions of cellular proliferation-related proteins depending on the dose of DCE, i.e., DCE-2.5, DCE-5, and DCE-10. In the histological observation of RAW 264.7 cells treated with DCE for 12 hours, the average cell number shown in high magnification (×400) increased up to 157.7±15.34 by DCE-2.5 and 150.2±9.03 by DCE-5, but decreased by DCE-10 (116.3±12.76) to the level of the control (112.5±13.3) (Fig. 1). Many RAW 264.7 cells treated by DCE-2.5 and DCE-5 became round to polygonal in shape, implying the frequent mitotic figures, while RAW 264.7 cells treated with DCE-10 showed dendritic cytoplasm processes similar to the cells in the control group.

    In the IP-HPCL analysis, the proliferation-related proteins, such as PCNA, Ki-67, and MPM2 showed consistent up-regulation by DCE 2.5 and DCE-5, but there was sparse proliferation effect by DCE-10 compared to the control. The cellular proliferation effect of DCE was the highest in the DCE-2.5 treatment, and gradually decreased in DCE-5, but it became similar to the control level in DCE-10. On the other hand, a proliferation inhibitor, p21 was decreased in DCE-2.5 but gradually recovered to the control level in DCE-5 and DCE-10 treatment (Fig. 2).

    Regarding the cMyc/MAX/MAD signaling, the RAW 264.7 cells treated with DCE showed the activation of proliferation (cMyc-MAX signaling) with the inactivation of anti-proliferation factor, MAD, in DCE 2.5 and DCE-5 treatment. These cMyc/MAX/MAD signaling were almost not affected by DCE-10. The co-expression of cMyc and MAX was more intense in DCE-5 treatment than in DCE-2.5 treatment, and the cMyc expression was reduced by the increased expression of MAD in DCE-10 treatment. These dynamic changes of cMyc/MAX/MAD protein expression indicated that the cMyc-related cellular proliferation dominantly occurred in DCE-5 treatment, which was subsequently suppressed in DCE-10 treatment (Fig. 3).

    The p53/Rb-1/E2F-1 signaling was variable in the RAW 264.7 cells treated with different dose of DCE. RAW 264.7 cells treated with DCE showed the activation of E2F-1 by decrease of tumor suppressor protein, Rb-1 in DCE-2.5, while gradual inactivation of E2F-1 by increase of Rb-1 in DEC-5 and DCE-10. The expression of p53 was slightly increased in DCE-5 treatment, but subsequently recovered to the control level in DCE-10 treatment. These dynamic changes of p53/Rb-1/E2F-1 protein expression indicated that the E2F-1-related cellular proliferation dominantly occurred in DCE-2.5 treatment, which was gradually suppressed in DCE-5 and DCE-10 treatment (Fig. 4).

    Taken together, the DCE-2.5 and DCE-5 induced the proliferation of RAW 264.7 cells in vitro, while DCE-10 produced sparse effect on the proliferation of RAW 264.7 cells. The essential proliferation-related proteins, E2F-1 and cMyc were differently expressed in RAW 264.7 cells depending on the dose of DCE. The RAW 264.7 cells showed the dominant expression of E2F-1 in DCE-2.5 treatment and the dominant expression of cMyc in DCE-5 treatment compared to the control, while they showed no dominant expression of both proteins in DCE-10 treatment.

    IV.DISCUSSION

    Although coffee drinking was known to give some beneficial effects on human health, the accumulated amount of coffee in the body is hardly measurable to control its antioxidative role in the individual people11). And more, the complicated coffee elements produced while coffee bean roasting are also not elucidated clearly so far. Therefore, in order to know the cellular effect of coffee extract in vivo, we made the DCE through simple dialysis method using cellulose bag to get the small elements less than 1000 Da, and the DCE was directly applied into the RAW 264.7 cell culture. The DCE may contain some coffee elements which are not freely absorbable through gastrointestinal tract in vivo, so that it is presumed that the DCE may induce some harmful effect on the cells in in vitro experiment. Nevertheless, the major part of DCE is expected to play the similar role in the cell culture in vitro to the ordinary coffee drink in vivo, which is expected to be absorbed freely from animal gastrointestinal tract in vivo. Therefore, it is assumed that the dialyzed coffee molecules may be appropriate for the application into in vitro cell culture. Drinking coffee has been known to enhance the immunity as well as cardiovascular stimulation and so on12-14). For the immunological effects of dialyzed coffee molecules, the present study utilized the murine macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7, to perform the histological observation and different protein expression assays.

    First of all, in the histological observation the DCE induce the proliferation of RAW 264.7 cells, resulted in the most increased cell number in DCE-2.5 treatment and followed by in DCE-5 treatment but almost similar cell number in DCE-10 treatment in the present study. These findings were also similar to the preliminary study done previously1).

    In the IP-HPCL analysis the proliferation-related proteins, the cellular proliferation effect of DCE was the highest in the DCE-2.5 treatment, and gradually decreased in DCE-5, but it became similar to the control level in DCE-10. Particularly, the co-expression of cMyc and MAX was more intense in DCE-5 treatment than in DCE-2.5 treatment, and cMyc expression was reduced by the increased expression of MAD in DCE-10 treatment. These dynamic changes of cMyc/MAX/MAD protein expression may be implicative for the dominant cMyc-related cellular proliferation in DCE-5 treatment. As the cMyc/MAX/MAD network comprises a group of transcription factors whose distinct interations result in gene-specific transcriptional activation or repression 15). In this study, the co-expressions of cMyc/MAX and cMyc/MAD were clearly distinguishable in the IP-HPLC anaylsis, thereby it could be defined that the cellular proliferation of RAW 264.7 was affected by the dynamic expression of cMyc signaling.

    The p53/Rb-1/E2F-1 signaling was also variable in the RAW 264.7 cells depending on the dose of DCE. The activation of E2F-1 was associated with the decrease of tumor suppressor protein, Rb-1 in DCE-2.5, and the inactivation of E2F-1 was related to the increase of Rb-1 in DEC-5 and DCE-10. However, the expression of p53 was slightly increased in DCE-5 treatment, but subsequently recovered to the control level in DCE-10 treatment. These dynamic changes of p53/Rb-1/E2F-1 protein expression may be deeply implicative for the elevated E2F-1-related cellular proliferation in DCE-2.5 treatment.

    The main finding of the present study cements the conclusion as shown in Fig.5. A scheme representing the dose dependent cellular effect of DEC in RAW 264.7 cells in vitro indicated that DCE-2.5 showed the most intense proliferative effect, and followed by DCE-5. These enhanced proliferations of RAW 264.7 cells, macrophage, might be related to the increase of innate immunity (Fig. 5). However, the additional investigation should be followed to explore more biological effect of DCE with precise molecular biological methods.

    As mentioned previously, coffee extract was not usually considered to play specific interaction with certain signaling proteins, but the DCE induced remarkable changes in the expression of proliferatio-related proteins in this study. Especially, the DCE dose dependent change of cMyc and E2F-1 signaling was conspicuous in RAW 264.7 cells. This DCE dose dependent modality in protein expression may be caused by the biochemical properties of DCE elements, including caffein, chlorogenic acid, etc., which are small organic compounds interacting with various cellualr substances.

    In summary, this study was performed to know the cellular effect of coffee drink using the dialyzed coffee extract (DCE). The RAW 264.7 cells treated with the amount equivalent to 2.5, 5, and 10 cups of coffee were cultured for 12 hours, and their protein extracts were analyzed by IP-HPLC. RAW 264.7 cells differently expressed their proliferation-related proteins depending on the dose of DCE-2.5, DCE-5, and DCE-10, and resulted that the DCE-2.5 and DCE-5 induced the proliferation of RAW 264.7 cells by increased expression of E2F-1 and cMyc, respectively, while DCE-10 produced sparse effect on the proliferation of RAW 264.7 cells.

    Figure

    KAOMP-41-2-63_F1.gif

    A-D: Photomicrographs of RAW 264.7 culture treated with DCE for 12 hours (×400), exhibiting different cell number depending on the dose of DCE. E: A graph plotted with the cell number of each group (A, B, C, and D). The cell number was greatest by DCE-2.5 (157.7±15.34), and followed by DCE-5 (150.2±9.03), and became similar to the control (112.5±13.3) by DCE-10 (116.3±12.76).

    KAOMP-41-2-63_F2.gif

    IP-HPCL analysis for the cellular proliferation in RAW 264.7 cells treated with DCE. A: A bar graph, B: A line graph using the same data for the expression of the proliferation-related proteins, Ki-67, PCNA, MPM2 and p21, denotes consistent up-regulation by DCE 2.5 and DCE-5 but almost no effect of cellular proliferation by DCE-10. On the other hand, a proliferation inhibitor, p21 was decreased in DCE-2.5 treatment and gradually recovered to the control in DCE-5 and DCE-10 treatment.

    KAOMP-41-2-63_F3.gif

    IP-HPLC analysis for the cMyc/MAX/MAD signaling in RAW 264.7 cells treated with DCE. A: A bar graph, B: A line graph with the same data for the expression of cMyc, MAX and MAD, denotes the activation of proliferation (cMyc-MAX signaling) and the inactivation of anti-proliferation (cMyc-MAD signaling) in DCE 2.5 and DCE-5 treatment. These cMyc/MAX/MAD signaling were not affected by DCE-10.

    KAOMP-41-2-63_F4.gif

    IP-HPLC analysis for the p53/Rb-1/E2F-1 signaling in RAW 264.7 cells treated with DCE. A: A bar graph, B: A line graph with the same data for the expression of p53, Rb-1 and E2F-1, denoting the activation of E2F-1 by decrease of tumor suppressor protein, Rb-1 in DCE-2.5 treatment, while gradual inactivation of E2F-1 by increase of Rb-1 in DEC-5 and DCE-10 treatment. The expression changes of p53 were similar to those of Rb-1 but relatively minimum by DCE-5, and almost not affected by DCE-10.

    KAOMP-41-2-63_F5.gif

    A scheme representing the dose dependent cellular effect of DEC in RAW 264.7 cells in vitro. DCE-2.5 produced the most intense proliferative effect, and followed by DCE-5. This enhanced proliferation of RAW 264.7 cells, macrophages, might be related to the increase of innate immunity.

    Table

    Reference

    1. Yoon CS , Lee SK (2016) Preliminary study on the Cell Biological Effect of Dialyzed Coffee Extract in RAW 264 Cells , Korean J Oral Maxillofac Pathol, Vol.40 ; pp.911-920
    2. Vaseghi G , Haghjoo-Javanmard S , Naderi J (2016) Coffee consumption and risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer a dose-response meta-analysis , Eur J Cancer Prev,
    3. Leung AC , Cook LS , Swenerton K (2016) Tea, coffee, and caffeinated beverage consumption and risk of epithelial ovarian cancers , Cancer Epidemiol, Vol.45 ; pp.119-125
    4. Bai K , Cai Q , Jiang Y (2016) Coffee consumption and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma a meta-analysis of eleven epidemiological studies , Onco Targets Ther, Vol.9 ; pp.4369-4375
    5. Muqaku B , Tahir A , Klepeisz P (2016) Coffee consumption modulates inflammatory processes in an individual fashion , Mol Nutr Food Res, Vol.60 ; pp.2529-2541
    6. Kennedy OJ , Roderick P , Buchanan R (2016) Systematic review with meta-analysis coffee consumption and the risk of cirrhosis , Aliment Pharmacol Ther, Vol.43 ; pp.562-574
    7. Stalmach A , Williamson G , Crozier A (2014) Impact of dose on the bioavailability of coffee chlorogenic acids in humans , Food Funct, Vol.5 ; pp.1727-1737
    8. Buscemi S , Verga S , Batsis JA (2009) Dose-dependent effects of decaffeinated coffee on endothelial function in healthy subjects , Eur J Clin Nutr, Vol.63 ; pp.1200-1205
    9. Kim YS (2015) Protein Expression Changes Induced by Cisplatin in an Oral Cancer Cell Line as Determined by Immunoprecipitation-Based High Performance Liquid Chromatography , Korean J Oral Maxillofac Pathol, Vol.39 ; pp.567-582
    10. Kim YS , Lee SK (2015) IP-HPLC Analysis of Human Salivary Protein Complexes , Korean J Oral Maxillofac Pathol, Vol.39 ; pp.615-622
    11. Rietveld A , Wiseman S (2003) Antioxidant effects of tea evidence from human clinical trials , J Nutr, Vol.133 ; pp.3285S-3292S
    12. Loftfield E , Shiels MS , Graubard BI (2015) Associations of Coffee Drinking with Systemic Immune and Inflammatory Markers , Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, Vol.24 ; pp.1052-1060
    13. Lofvenborg JE , Andersson T , Carlsson PO (2014) Coffee consumption and the risk of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults--results from a Swedish case-control study , Diabet Med, Vol.31 ; pp.799-805
    14. Nosalova G , Prisenznakova L , Paulovicova E (2011) Antitussive and immunomodulating activities of instant coffee arabinogalactan-protein , Int J Biol Macromol, Vol.49 ; pp.493-497
    15. Banerjee A , Hu J , Goss DJ (2006) Thermodynamics of protein-protein interactions of cMyc, Max, and Mad effect of polyions on protein dimerization , Biochemistry, Vol.45 ; pp.2333-2338
    오늘하루 팝업창 안보기 닫기